The Temperature Also Rises
By: Selwyn Duke
With the issuing of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report on February 2, waxing climactic about the climatic is the order of the day. The esteemed, government-funded scientists with no agenda who rendered the study inform us that man is almost certainly responsible for rising temperatures and, furthermore, that dramatic climate change is unstoppable. But, after seeing various luminaries sound the alarm, I think I can confidently say that, hellâ€™s bells, weâ€™re darn well gonna try anyway.
And itâ€™s about time. Weâ€™ve long known we were going to die unless we stopped spewing that plant-sustaining CO2 into the air. The thing is, though, my botanical sources tell me the plants are fearful that theyâ€™ll die if they donâ€™t stop spewing that human-sustaining oxygen into the air. So our task is clear.
We must beat the plants.
Iâ€™m tired of the lies. I remember when I was a wee lad in grammar school and they warned us of an upcoming ice age. That wasnâ€™t as scary as the talk about the killer bees, but why, teach, oh, why did you hide the truth about melting glaciers, rising oceans and vicious hurricanes? I suppose the ice age fiction was less unsettling to young minds. At least we could look forward to extra snow days.
This is why I wonâ€™t sit idly by and watch todayâ€™s prevarications fobbed off on the next generation.
Can you believe I actually heard some craven, callous individuals try to rationalize away our destruction of the planet with the fancy that weather is cyclical (1500-year cycles of warming and cooling)? So thick is the propaganda that now an elaborate fiction has been woven to convince us that Al Gore, inventor of the Internet, could actually be wrong about global warming. Why, it just makes you hot under the collar. Now Iâ€™ll share what Iâ€™ve uncovered about the machinations of malevolent manufacturersâ€™ minions.
In a tale worthy of Hollywood, some â€œscientistsâ€ are peddling a story about a geological interval occurring between 750 and 600 million years ago, which they fancifully call the â€œCryogenian Period.â€ They tell us that during this time the Earth was completely covered by ice and snow. Moreover, theyâ€™d have us believe there have been numerous ice ages since then, with the last major one ending about 12,000 years ago and causing glaciers to extend as far south as Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Outrageously, their fiction involves the notion that these alleged events were followed by warming trends that sometimes initiated intervals in which glaciers were completely absent from our planet, all without industrialization, as if weâ€™d believe this beautiful blue orb could experience such wrenching changes without manâ€™s meddlesome hands.
This is an insult to our intelligence. We all know that before the curse of humanity â€“ and especially prior to industrialization â€“ the Earth was a pacific place, where birds sang and fish swam and there was love and liberty, serenity and solidarity, and the lion lay down with the lamb.
Continuing with this weather cycle con, weâ€™re also told that between 1550 and 1920 there was a â€œLittle Ice Age,â€ a time that saw increased glaciation in the Alps. We can easily put the lie to this, however, for during part of this period CO2 levels were rising, yet, we are to believe that temperatures were dropping?
Conversely, itâ€™s also said that there were times when CO2 levels dropped but temperature increased. It is to laugh.
Even the government is in on this charade. We know that anthropogenic glacial melt-off will cause rising sea levels that will inundate Florida and other low-lying regions, such as the Netherlands (donâ€™t you realize our inaction could result in the destruction of the prostitution and drug capital of the world?). So, right on cue, the claims that during glacial periods Floridaâ€™s sea level was as much as three-hundred feet lower than today, and during the peak of interglacial ones it was one-hundred feet higher. This, all without manâ€™s influence? Poppycock! I bet these are probably the same people who tell us 98 percent of Renaissance painters were white males and that the US wasnâ€™t founded by anti-Christian, ACLU lawyers.
Then, I found pro-plant being disgorged by the odious Center for Global Food Issues. These miscreants actually sing the praises of higher CO2 levels and say,
. . . a warmer planet has beneficial effects on food production. It results in longer growing seasonsâ€”more sunshine and rainfallâ€”while summertime high temperatures change little. And a warmer planet means milder winters and fewer crop-killing frosts. . . . Infrared satellite readings show that the Earth has been getting greener since 1982, thanks apparently to increased rainfall and CO2. Worldwide, vegetative activity generally increased by 6.17 percent between 1982 and 1999â€”despite extended cloudiness due to the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo and other well-publicized environmental stresses. . . . When dinosaurs walked the earth (about 70 to 130 million years ago), there was from five to ten times more CO2 in the atmosphere than today. The resulting abundant plant life allowed the huge creatures to thrive. . . . Based on nearly 800 scientific observations around the world, a doubling of CO2 from present levels would improve plant productivity on average by 32 percent across species.
And theyâ€™re not alone in this subterfuge. The carries water for the flora as well, echoing these sentiments and making the bold claim that a desire for greater plant yield is why botanists pump CO2 into greenhouses. Even more astoundingly, this organization states that until just recently plants might have been suffering from CO2 deprivation.
Donâ€™t you see whatâ€™s going on? Those innocuous looking organisms you so lovingly nurture in their pots, as you provide water, sunlight and fertilizer, have designs on our civilization. Havenâ€™t you ever the Day of the Triffids? I tell you, weâ€™re locked in a battle for survival itself with the plants.
Let not your heart be troubled, though, my friends. The great teacher, the man who in a way exemplifies vegetative activity, Al Gore, is on the case with his keen intellect and sage stewardship. Why, I hear heâ€™s going to make a sequel to An Inconvenient Truth titled Presidential Aspirations in the Balance, in which he will illustrate the direness of our predicament by demonstrating how he can fry an organic egg on his head in Bangor, Maine, at sunrise. Here, too, though, crafty climatologists muddy the waters, as they claim their research shows that Earthâ€™s temperature rises an average of half a degree every time Gore gives a speech.
Of course, these ardent apologists for industrialization try to put a happy face on the CO2 molecule, but even they canâ€™t deny that the gasâ€™ levels are rising. So, lo and behold, they try to sell us the line that itâ€™s the result of natural processes.
For instance, a vile propagandist named Phillip V. Brennan wrote a in which he mentions there is now much more geothermal activity beneath the ocean floor than scientists had suspected. Ostensibly, this process heats up the seas, causing them to release more CO2 into the atmosphere. Brennan even tries to explain away our more mercurial weather, quoting a colleague who maintains that,
â€œ. . . it is not global warming thatâ€™s causing the oceans to heat, itâ€™s heated oceans that are warming the globe and setting up a scenario that includes among its consequences more and increasingly violent hurricanes, tornadoes and blizzards.â€
Yeah, sure, next heâ€™ll tell us tsunamis are caused by underwater earthquakes.
Anyway, this Brennan character has no credibility. Despite the fact we know that every scientist agrees with the anthropogenic global warming thesis, he claims that a petition was signed by,
â€œ. . . over 18,000 scientists who are totally opposed to the Kyoto Protocol, which committed the world’s leading industrial nations to cut their production of greenhouse gases from fossil fuels.â€
Next, we hear the Earth destroyersâ€™ answer to why our polar ice caps are melting. They that the ice caps on Mars are probably melting as well, which is supposed to vindicate the idea that natural cycles are the cause.
But thereâ€™s something they wonâ€™t tell you, information I risk my life by divulging.
Thereâ€™s actually a civilization of greedy little green industrialists on the red planet, who drive SUVs, heat their saucers with mahogany and teak, smoke fine cigars and are mean to children and old people. And the only reason this is kept secret is that free traders want our shores inundated with their cheap goods, which are brought in through Area 51.
I now ask you to compare the dubious claims of the industrial apologists with the aforementioned facts. I think it will be clear where the true sanity lies.
The truth is, as Mr. Gore would say, inconvenient. We just donâ€™t want to accept that weâ€™ll have to radically alter our lifestyles; why, itâ€™s ridiculous to think we can maintain our love affair with the combustion engine. As Gore told us in Earth in the Balance, the automobile poses a most grave threat to mankind. And, no, wise guys, he didnâ€™t say that because he spent time in a car with Ted Kennedy at the wheel.
So I advise you all to follow the lead of French President Jacques Chirac, who found time between mistresses to warn us that â€œWe are on the historic threshold of the irreversible,â€ as he called for a â€œrevolutionâ€ to save mankind. Besides, there is grave concern that Hillary Clintonâ€™s personality may melt.
As for me, Iâ€™m going to go out and kill a plant. Now, what will I wear? Dang, the weatherman got the forecast wrong again. . . .
Contact Selwyn Duke or follow him on Twitter