Dialogue with Democrats Now Akin to Diplomacy with Terrorists?
By: Sher Zieve
The problem with Islamic terrorists is that they say one thing with their lies to the appeasing West and the polar opposite to their own people. One only need listen to what Iranian President Ahmadinejad says in his speeches to the fawning leftist media and, then, follow up with his messages to the Iranian and Islamic world. From the Islamist point of view, everything and everyone non-Muslim needs to be irrevocably destroyed. The media avoids the truth of what is being said by this and other Islamo-fascist terrorist leaders, in favor of the feel-good lies. This is stupidity in its most grotesque and dangerous guise. These terrorists cannot be viably dealt with in a diplomatic manner. Diplomacy never has and never will work with those who have vowed to obliterate the diplomats and their countries of origin.
I suggest that the same can be said for the currentâ€”albeit ongoingâ€”Democrat attack on anything and everyone non-leftist-Democrat that needs to be terminated; with whatever weapon is handy at the moment. Recently, the leftist George Soros funded Democrat Party money-raising machine MoveOn.org ran a hit Ad against General David Petraeus that accused himâ€”and the entire US Military by associationâ€”of being a traitor. The Ad sparked a national controversy and an eventual Senate vote to condemn the Ad was taken. (1) The condemnation vote passed by 72-25â€”meaning that there were still Democrat senators who, apparently, supported the smear against one of the top generals in our nation. Note: This is yet another example of the Democrat revulsionâ€”if not hatredâ€”with the US military.
Regarding those who voted against the condemnation of one of their primary funding sources are two Democrat presidential hopefulsâ€”Senators Hillary Clinton and Christopher Dodd. Their messageâ€”which also includes the MoveOn.org stance of â€œwe haste everything USA especially those who work to protect itâ€â€”most certainly seems to be: â€œAs long as itâ€™s enough, weâ€™ll support anyone who pays us!â€ Note: When the vote was taken, Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) managed to avoid it and any additional controversy, by being absent from the Senate chamber. Instead Democratsâ€”angered by the fact that their actual-and-true association with the radical MoveOn groupâ€”decided to attempt a change of subject and again attack conservative icon Rush Limbaugh. Democrat leaders, including but not limited to Senate Majority leader Harry Reid and Tom Harkin, vilified Limbaugh. Both of these senators and others from their party have blasted Limbaugh for his â€œphony soldiersâ€ comments. The fact that they have been anti-military and anti-soldiers for years and Rush was referring to actual and verifiable phony soldiers (those who claim to be soldiers and were or are not or claimed to have seen combatâ€”which they did not) appears to have eluded them. It is also patently obvious that they either did not hear or read the actual transcript of Rushâ€™s comments orâ€”even more insidiouslyâ€”chose to ignore it. After all, Democrats needed to mount a counter-insurgency against the â€œother sideâ€ by whatever
means were necessary.
The reality that they are now blatantly lying is immaterial. Besides, they have done it many times before. And the leftist press was willingâ€”if not salivatingâ€”to get the bogus story into the publicâ€™s hands and minds. So, it did. The fact that the liberalsâ€™ own Charley Gibson had done an ABC exposÃ©â€”days beforeâ€”on these same and other â€œphony soldiersâ€ was of no importance to them. (3) Getting the â€œright wingerâ€ Rush Limbaugh was their only obsession.
Note: How can one have any sort of a real dialogue with individuals and/or groups who must consistently lie to the American people, in order to get a pointâ€”any point at allâ€”across?
We already know that terrorists and their leaders say one thing when theyâ€™re in front of a Western audience and the exact opposite when theyâ€™re speaking to listeners at home. Sound familiar?
And speaking of Kandidate Clinton, it was announced by her campaign committee Monday that admitted National Archive document-stealer-and-destroyer Sandy Berger is going to be an â€œunpaid advisorâ€: to the senatorâ€™s presidential bid. Hiring an admitted thief seems to be nothing new for Ms. Clinton. Payback for a job well done, perhaps?
Although the leftist media has worked diligently to downplay it, Clintonâ€™s association with the previously fleeing Ponzi-scheme convicted felon Norman Hsu placed over $850,000 into her coffers. (4) Even Senator Barack Obama worked to get money from Hsu. (5) These are your two top presidential choices, libs.
But, in answer to this articleâ€™s question: (Is) dialogue with Democrats now akin to diplomacy with terrorists? I know my answer. Youâ€™ll need to figure your own out.
New Media Alliance Television (www.nmatv.com)
Sher Zieve is a staff writer for the New Media Alliance, Inc. (www.thenma.org). The New Media Alliance is a non-profit (501c3) national coalition of writers, journalists and grass-roots media outlets.