Media Shuts Out McCain
By: Sher Zieve
In yet another blatant attempt to render the Republican presidential candidate impotent, therefore propping up their secular messiah Barack Obama, the New York Times has rejected an Op-Ed by presidential contender John McCain. Instead, this â€œnewsâ€ paper has reportedly told McCain that his Op-Ed needs to be more like Obamaâ€™sâ€”which was accepted (surpriseâ€”surprise!â€) by the Times. In case there are a few individuals whoâ€™ve been living in a cave for the last year or soâ€”Obama is for an immediate pull-out of US troops from Iraq and McCain is not. Obama believes the pull-out should occur based upon his ideology and McCain believes any pull-out should occur based upon whatâ€™s actually transpiring in the region. Brian Rogers, a McCain spokesman, said of the Timesâ€™ rejection that it â€œreveals where they’re coming fromâ€ and that McCainâ€™s position â€œwill not change based on politics or the demands of The New York Times.â€
Suffice it to say, the New York Times and the rest of the leftist mainstream press does notâ€”let me repeat thatâ€”does not like McCainâ€™s position. Heâ€™s not far-Left enough for their tastes. Instead, they prefer an appeasement position that both serves to embolden the terrorists and essentially gelds the USA. Therefore, they have begun their now-overt censorship of all who disagree with them. The leftistsâ€™ bastion New York Times is merely the largest and the first.
Note: For all to observe, this is what the Left means and has always meant by any and all â€œfairness doctrines.â€ Anyone who expresses any idea that disagrees with theirs is not â€œfairâ€ and must be silenced. Only the Leftâ€™s ideas must be heard. As an example, McCainâ€™s views are to be ignored and even actively suppressed, while Obamaâ€™s plans are touted as â€œsmartâ€ and â€œrealistic.â€ Realistic? Isnâ€™t Obama the same guy that had already issued his plans for Afghanistan before heâ€™d ever set foot in the country? The press has also worked diligently to cover-up Obamaâ€™s statements about the â€œneedâ€ for a national police force. His comments were quietly removed from any transcripts by his campaign and the media. Obama says that this â€œcivilian national security force must be just as powerful and just as strongâ€ as the US military! Is this something with which the Marxist press agrees? Apparently so or they wouldnâ€™t have worked so hard to remove it from public view. And, by the way, Mr. Obama was not referring to â€˜national serviceâ€™. He speaks of national service earlier on in his speech. The national police force comments are chilling and all too reminiscent of Nazi Germany and Stalinâ€™s Russia to be ignored.
The New York Times truly needs to change its motto from â€œAll the news thatâ€™s fit to printâ€ to this line from Danteâ€™s Inferno: â€œAbandon every hope, ye who enter here.â€
Whether you are an Obama supporter or not, these truths about this man must be told. It is your choice as to whether or not you choose to listen. If not, you enter his new and frightening world at your own considerable risk.
Obamaâ€™s National Police Force: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEhzvyblUy4