Chris (â€œHardbuttâ€) Matthews: Just Another Way To Spell â€œStupidâ€
By: Michael John McCrae
Chris Matthews has a television show. This MSNBC puke-fest entitled â€œHardballâ€ allows Mr. Matthews his opportunity to show his liberal stripes to all of the 700,000 or so liberal morons who tune into his egoistic Catholicism and general idiocy each week.
Mr. Matthews holds no good will toward his fellow man. Oh, if you agree with his outrageous slant toward the Marxist ideal, then you can be his buddy. You might even claim 15 minutes of fame on his program. But Mr. Matthews is much more inclined to protecting scumbags like Anthony Weiner than any conservative who isnâ€™t sucking up to Barack Hussein Obama.
Matthews is not an equal-time kind of host. His program is strictly leftist and unbalanced. You never know what old Chris will say on a given day, but â€œNewsbusters.orgâ€ gives us a recent sample of Matthewâ€™s vitriol in defense of Democrat Anthony Weinerâ€™s penchant for â€œsextingâ€ (media word).
â€œI want you to pick this up, Ben. This is, to me, the stakes here. If he stays, they never get the leadership back. They never get the Speakership back because the people in the rural areas of this country who are Christian conservative culturally – you can say backward if you want – but they don’t like this kind of stuff at all. They’re not part of that 56 percent in Brooklyn and Queens who say, “okay, we can live with this guy.” Your thoughts, Ben? Isn’t that the cutting edge of this?â€
Not only does Matthews give us insight into his true feelings on â€œruralâ€ America (he being the elite snob), but he also gives us insight into the decadent 56% of Americans who comprise Rep. Weinerâ€™s constituency. Even Nancy Pelosi and Charles Rangel (Democrats) have said it is up to Weinerâ€™s [decadent] constituency to determine if they want continued representation by the sexting â€œtweetaholicâ€ (my word).
Speaking personally as a â€œculturally backward Christian conservativeâ€ Matthews has certainly offended me. I suppose it would be better in his mind that I be a culturally progressive (i.e. liberal) Catholic Christian, who is acceptable to sexual perversion, pedophilic priests and adulterous Congressional Representatives from New York.
This is typical of any liberal caught with his/her hand down anyoneâ€™s pants. Look at all the protection given Former Rapist-in-Chief Bill Clinton. Look at the 54 ethics violations of Democrat Charles Rangel (heâ€™s still around). Look at Democrat Barney Frankâ€™s associations with his gay lovers (heâ€™s still around). Look at the current foreign-born-but-elected-usurper who was not properly vetted by the United States government and who has put the United States on the true path to a socialist utopia in superior debt to Communist China (he still hasnâ€™t been impeached).
You might ask how is it that all these scumbags manage political survival and I might answer that it is largely due to the protection offered by the likes of Chris Matthews and media similar. Mainstream media champions liberalism without much investigation or vetting. But they sure will ask for help to read through Sarah Palinâ€™s 24,000 emails. This same media doesnâ€™t even mention Obamaâ€™s â€œblackberryâ€ anymore. Iâ€™d love to look through those personals to William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan!
Chris Matthews is a media hack without a true investigative bone in his body. I hope all those â€œculturally backward conservative Christiansâ€ turn out to vote in 2012 and I hope they only vote for other culturally conservative backward Christians. We see what a culturally progressive so-called Christian, Barack Hussein Obama has done to American domestic and foreign policies over the past two years. That hasnâ€™t been pretty and it is getting uglier every day.
Weiner can go. Obama can go. While weâ€™re at it Matthews can go too.
Read more: HERE