Gay Activists: â€œ…itâ€™s all legitimateâ€
By: Michael John McCrae
“Everyone has to choose their own way to get your message across and as long as you’re not hurting anyone it’s all legitimate.” (Rachel E.B. Lang)
The short Fox news article was entitled: â€œBachmann Glittered at Conservative Blogger Conferenceâ€ (June 19, 2011); giving a brief detail of (â€œ…a really good-natured, light-heartedâ€) act of Gay terrorism. This is the third such â€œreally good naturedâ€ act of Gay terrorism fostered on Republican Presidential hopefuls. Newt Gingrich and Tim Pawlenty have already been â€œglitteredâ€ at separate events.
According to Ms. E.B. Lang her action was to bring to light Candidate Bachmannâ€™s â€œsupport of an anti-gay marriage initiative in the stateâ€ [of Minnesota]. So, in absence of a valid point of debate Gay â€œrightsâ€ activists resort to throwing things (like any baby trapped in its bed) to gain attention.
Ms. Langâ€™s message is the wrong message to send. To compound matters; throwing objects of any type at anyone is the most possible wrong way to send a message. There have been pies and other food objects thrown at conservative speakers and it is probably only a matter of time until rocks and bullets become the projectiles of choice. True conservatives know right from wrong, good from bad, and morally correct from morally incorrect. Homosexuality, no matter the personal opinion is morally incorrect.
Ms. Lang and all â€œGay activistsâ€ of her stripe probably believe people are â€œbornâ€ homosexual. Yet, in a highly contradictory fashion, the gay community is forcing public schools to â€œteachâ€ some very strange homosexual ideals. If people are â€œbornâ€ homosexual, what is left to teach?
According to a recent column by Phyllis Schlafly entitled: â€œObnoxious Classroom Curriculumâ€ â€œStudents in all grades at Oakland, California’s Redwood Heights Elementary School were given two days of gender diversity lessons designed to teach them that gender is not confined to the “binary concept” of two options. The lessons promoted “gender neutrality,” the concept that no distinctions between male and female should be legally allowed. The major message was that “gender identity” means people can choose to be different from the sex assigned at birth and can freely “change their sex.” According to [anti-bullying group] Gender Spectrum, “Gender identity is a spectrum where people can be girls, feel like girls, they feel like boys, they feel like both, or they can feel like neitherâ€¦ Fourth-graders were told that if someone were born with male “private parts” but identified more with being a girl, he should be “accepted” and “respected.” They were taught “gender fluidity,” which means a boy might be a boy one day and a girl the next.â€
With such non-scientific, homosexual clap-trap being pushed to all grade-schoolers in California, is it any wonder children are confused as to whether mommy is actually daddy? There are many bills pending in the California state legislature indicating rising acceptance of immoral subjects destined to become â€œnormalâ€ curricula proffered by the public schools in that state. You should take time to read Ms. Schalflyâ€™s columns on education posted to the Eagle Forum website.
But â€œâ€¦itâ€™s all legitimateâ€. So let me throw this out and weâ€™ll see if we get a flinch from the Gay activists. From the Book of Matthew Chapter 19: â€œ4And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, 5And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?â€
Allow me to throw this one too: from the Book of Romans Chapter One: â€œâ€¦21 when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23And changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, 24Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves: 25Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator,â€¦26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemlyâ€¦â€
So to Ms. Lang and all those who believe the lie I simply give you back your own words: â€œ”Everyone has to choose their own way to get your message across and as long as you’re not hurting anyone it’s all legitimate.” (Rachel E.B. Lang)