How Many Leftist Scumbags Does It Take To Screw In A Fluorescent Lightbulb?
By: Michael John McCrae
If you havenâ€™t read the Chicago Sun Times article about a fellow by the name of Francisco Tirado; perhaps youâ€™ve read about one of his other 65 arrests for various reasons. In his latest episode of criminality he was released on a $300,000 bond. He will probably be arrested shortly for the 66th time. It is possible this guy can be â€œGoogledâ€ for his complete criminal history, but this 65th arrest intrigues me only because this guy is from Illinois. Is he related to President Barack Hussein Obama? If Uncle Omar and Auntie Zetuni can beat immigration raps; walking free and unfettered, I believe Mr. Tirado must have a direct line to the Obama Justice Department. The guy is a real scumbag.
And speaking of scumbags the â€œReal Clear Politicsâ€ website reported recent comments by: â€œActress, comedienne and now author Roseanne Barrâ€¦â€ She was opining what to do with the nationâ€™s banks that accepted â€œbailoutâ€ money. Quoting Ms. Barr: â€œPart of my platform is, of course, the guilty must be punished and that we no longer let our children see their guilty leaders getting away with murder. Because it teaches children, you know, that they don’t have to have any morals as long as they have guns and are bullies and I don’t think that’s a good message,”
Ms. Barr is upset that â€œguilty leadersâ€ are getting away with murder. Of course she isnâ€™t talking about Zimbabwe, Communist China, Cuba, Venezuela, Myanmar, Nepal, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Iran or any of the myriad dictatorships around the world that actually, physically murder real people. She is talking about banks. Her word about â€œgunsâ€ reminds me of our own gun-tote-in-chief, Barack Hussein Obama who said: â€œIf they bring a knife to the fight, you bring a gun!â€ Personally, I donâ€™t think thatâ€™s a â€œgood messageâ€ for children either.
Then there is our illustrious drone-user-in-chief that ignores the American Constitution (once again) to put a â€œHellfireâ€ missile up the rump of a so-called American citizen of Arab decent without the benefit of â€œdue-processâ€. But donâ€™t get me wrong on that account; Anwar Al-Awlaki and his entire entourage; now sitting in permanent â€œhellfireâ€ deserved exactly what Obama gave him. I would probably give our â€œbystanderâ€ in-chief a whole lot of credit and kudos if he wasnâ€™t such a â€œdickâ€ (as Mark Halperin might say) in just about everything else.
Ms. Barr continued with these gems of wisdom: “I do say that I am in favor of the return of the guillotine and that is for the worst of the worst of the guilty… I first would allow the guilty bankers to pay, you know, the ability to pay back anything over $100 million [of] personal wealth because I believe in a maximum wage of $100 million. And if they are unable to live on that amount of that amount then they should, you know, go to the reeducation camps and if that doesn’t help, then being beheaded,” Barr said with a straight face.â€
I thought that dollar amount; $100 million was interesting. That is the exact amount Harold Raines of Fannie Mae infamy walked off with shortly before the failure of that mortgage institution. That is probably the current cash amount in Ms. Barrâ€™s portfolio too. But the statement shows Ms. Barr has no compunction to sending people to â€œreeducation campsâ€ or simply cutting off someoneâ€™s head with a â€œguillotineâ€. I believe a â€œreeducation campâ€ is a communist ideal, while â€œbeheadingâ€ is the preferred method of radical Islamic terrorism. I donâ€™t think saying such things â€œwith a straight faceâ€ is a â€œgood messageâ€ for children either.
But I really donâ€™t blame Ms. Barr. She is simply using her bully â€œplatformâ€ to echo the sentiments of the crowds of scumbags now peppering the streets of Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston and Ney York City; demanding banks release them from their obligations to pay their mortgages and find them a job they are willing to do (probably a high salaried union job). Michael Moore and Susan Sarandon agree that Wall Street is evil and should be willing to give up all their investments to the street masses that have not earned their keep nor paid back their student loans, credit cards or mortgages.
These new mobs of so-called Americans are not the quiet, respectful TEA Party people. They are leftist beggars wanting their share of someone elseâ€™s sacrifice and hard work. The truth is the banks have been under the Federal â€œgunâ€ to give expensive mortgages to unqualified borrowers since the days of Jimmy Carterâ€™s â€œCommunity Redevelopment Actâ€. The â€œActâ€ was expanded under President Clinton and enforced by then Attorney General Janet Reno, who threatened banks that did not comply with Federal demands to give away home loans. With Chris (Country Wide) Dodd and Barneybob Squarefrank in the mix to protect the decaying Fannie Mae and Freddy Macâ€¦well, you know the rest of the story.
I believe if every politician who received campaign cash from Fannie and Freddy gave back those dollars and if Harold Raines gave back just $50 million of his $100 million Fannie Mae haul we might just see enough dollars to placate these new, leftist mobs of bloodsuckers. One might even include the hundreds of millions of dollars squandered by Obama on the â€œSolyndraâ€ Democrat Party money laundering operation!