Mock ‘marriage’ and the death of freedom

By: Matt Barber

While poorly decided U.S. Supreme Court cases are a dime a dozen, prior to  Wednesday, two stood alone as the most wretched and constitutionally groundless  in American History. First was the 1857 Dred Scott decision. Among other things,  it robbed African-Americans of both their U.S. citizenship and their  dignity.

Next came the 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade. It has robbed over 55 million U.S.  citizens of their very lives. For the first time in American history, the high  court imagined a phantom constitutional right for women to dismember alive their  own pre-born children.

Both of these cases are blights on American history. Fortunately, the first,  Dred Scott, has been officially relegated to the dustbin of judicial disgrace,  while the second, Roe v. Wade, continues to be used as justification for mass  genocide. With each passing day, the bodies of the innocents pile-up like God’s  chosen at Auschwitz.

Tragically, this past week we hit the unholy trifecta. A third precedential  abomination was added to the mix. On Wednesday, the high court handed down two  cases concerning the pagan left’s abjectly bizarre efforts to redefine the  age-old and immutable institution of marriage (Hollingsworth v. Perry and U.S.  v. Windsor). The more egregious of the two opinions, Windsor, presumes to  invalidate Section 3 of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), granting  limited federal recognition to sin-centric and sodomy-based same-sex  “marriage.”

Not only did this 5-4 decision effectively deconstruct the institution of  legitimate marriage, removing all ethical and legal justification for barring  similar such perverse “marriage” amalgamations as “gay marriage” (i.e.,  multi-party or incestuous nuptials) – it also laid the groundwork to force the  37 “marriage reality” states to join the remaining 13 in a corporate “marriage  equality” delusion. This is not just judicial activism; its judicial tyranny – a  potentially fatal self-inflicted wound to the high court’s yet waning  legitimacy.

Still, while much will be written about Windsor from a legal standpoint, for  now, let’s focus on another of the decision’s inevitable outcomes:  Anti-Christian persecution. If, through judicial fiat, “gay marriage” ultimately  becomes the law of the land, tens-of-millions of Christians (as well as Jews and  Muslims) will be forced to choose between obedience to God and obedience to  Caesar – between fidelity to conscience and government oppression.

Millions of us have already made  that choice.

As we’ve now seen in states that fancy mock “gay marriage,” for instance, the  only way to force Christian individuals and business owners – such as bakers,  photographers, innkeepers and florists – to lend their talents to sin-centered  “gay weddings” is through the power of the police state. This amounts to a  systemic, immoral and profoundly unconstitutional trampling of the First  Amendment.

What follows will be a deviant-sexual-behavior-based “LGBT” suspect minority  class with all the associated trimmings. In the eyes of government,  Bible-believing Christians will be treated as modern-day racists. Any outward  expression of the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic will be trumped by newfangled  “gay rights” and deemed verboten. For all intents and purposes, Christianity  will be criminalized. This is not mere speculation. It’s been the plan all  along.

Case in point: Chai Feldblum, President Obama’s EEOC commissioner – a lesbian  activist who supports “plural marriage” – has promised as much. She admits that  progressives “want to revolutionize societal norms” and believes that “gay sex  is a moral good.” She calls the clash between religious liberty and “sexual  liberty” a “zero-sum game,” meaning someone wins and someone loses. Guess who  loses? Feldblum has “a hard time coming up with any case in which religious  liberty should win.”

Even so, Wednesday, after the offending high court opinions were announced, I  was reminded by a close friend and fellow Christian attorney that, “God is in  control, and that has to be more than a slogan at times like this.”

Since, no doubt, the Obama NSA has already read our entire email exchange, I  thought I’d go ahead and share excerpts with you as well. My colleague’s  insights are profound. I found them encouraging. I hope you do, too.

“Amen,” I replied. “At the risk of sounding a bit apocalyptic, I’m fully  convinced that this is part of His divine plan – perhaps to begin separating the  wheat from the chaff. We have arrived: ‘As it was in the days of Noah, so it  will be at the coming of the Son of Man.’ Matthew 24:37.”

“I agree with you,” he responded, “and that conviction makes all this much  easier. What depresses me is the astonishing disconnect and irrationality that  sin so easily produces, and how quickly it spreads; we are truly sheep and fully  as stupid without a Good Shepherd.

“In my 35 years as a Christian, I never seriously believed we might end up in  prison for our faith – except, perhaps, for something like a pro-life  demonstration. This is the first time it seriously occurs to me that the  trajectory of the nation is such that it is possible in five to 10 years. Oddly,  this thought does not discourage or scare me; in fact, it’s almost a joyful  thought that we might have the privilege to suffer for our faith. Rejoice  greatly when men revile and persecute you for my name’s sake, for your reward is  great in Heaven (a rough paraphrase of Matthew 5:12).

“It may be that the truly toughest tests we had were earlier in our lives,”  he continued, “before we got fully engaged and in the movement. … Now we’re part  of networks with support from like-minded people, and we’re largely insulated  from what the opposition can do to us. The real heroes are our clients who speak  up at the risk of losing their livelihood, getting thrown out of school, or  getting death threats from the tolerance crowd. I feel now like my faith costs  me less than when I was in private practice before hostile judges and  antagonistic media hit-men.”

“You nailed it,” I replied. “What an honor that our Creator chose us before  time began to be part of a Gideon’s army of truth-tellers and defenders of the  faithful. It’s an amazing time to be alive. But, as you mentioned, although  we’re on the front lines, we also have tremendous support. It’s quite liberating  to be written-off by the world and, consequently, free to speak and behave in a  way that reflects the reality that we couldn’t give a rat’s behind what the  world thinks of us. Those we represent rarely have that luxury.

“Whether it’s one day or hundreds of years,” I continued, “I really believe  we are living in the last days (in the total scheme of time and space). I just  hope that when and if the time comes, the Holy Spirit gives me the strength of  character to not only refuse to deny His Truth, but to be like our martyred  brothers and sisters who walked up and kissed the stake before being burned  alive on it.

“Anyway, that’s enough trying to cheer each other up for now,” I joked. “Keep  on keepin’ on, my friend.”

Do I really believe American Christians will be burned at the stake over  counterfeit “gay marriage”? No. Do I believe Christians will face real  persecution, such as loss of livelihood, civil penalties, physical abuse or even  jail? Absolutely.

Still, come what may, we Christ followers must always remember this  admonition from Romans 12:12: “Be joyful in hope, patient in affliction, [and]  faithful in prayer.”

In other words, mock “marriage” or not: Keep on keepin’ on, my friend.

(Go to to  pledge no surrender on marriage).

About The Author Matt Barber:
Matt Barber (@jmattbarber on Twitter) is an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. He serves as vice president of Liberty Counsel Action. (This information is provided for identification purposes only.)

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.