Joining forces with the Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) “Operation Community Shield”, Gonzales has targeted criminal street gangs in six locations: Los Angeles, Ca., Tampa, Fla., the “222 Corridor” that runs from Easton to Lancaster, Penn., Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX., Cleveland Ohio and Milwaukee Wis.

To date, “Operation Community Shield” has netted 2,388 arrests, 900 of which were members of the deadly Mara Salvatruhca (MS-13) gang, and the confiscation of 117 firearms.

According to the National Drug Intelligence Center, the criminal membership of street gangs is more than 713,000. (1)

117 firearms. 2,388 arrests. 713,000 criminal gang members.

That’s an arrest rate of less than one half of one percent.

No disrespect to the rank and file, but given that ICE’s “Operation Community Shield” specifically targets foreign-born gang members, why so few arrests? What would prevent ICE from rounding up the illegal alien gang members and simply deporting them?

Does Mr. Bush’s faith based pronouncement that all illegal aliens are good-hearted people who are only trying to put food on the table apply to illegals engaged in robberies, murders and drug running too?

Attorney General Gonzales states, “…to fully combat gang crime, we also need to address the underlying personal, family and community factors that cause people to choose gangs over better, more productive alternatives…the Department of Justice gang prevention initiatives are intended to address these issues…”

Of course the best way to prevent criminal behavior is a strong family, adherence to religious beliefs and civic responsibility.

All of which have been supplanted, with disastrous results, by 40 years of ‘Great society” programs similar to those touted by Mr. Gonzales.

Clearly, when it comes to illegal aliens Mr. Gonzales, like Mr. Bush, feels flagrant criminality is a social, rather than a law enforcement issue.

Since 9/11, more and more of us have been outraged at Mr. Bush’s arrogance and neglect concerning border security and the illegal alien crisis in this country.

We have rightly asked why a sitting president in a time of war so readily dismisses the safety and security of his fellow citizens in favor of millions of foreign nationals illegally on our soil.

We have appealed to Mr. Bush’s common sense in suggesting that an unregulated border is an open invitation to those same terrorists we are at war with.

Mr. Bush and his supporters have responded by calling us vigilantes, racists, bigots, xenophobes, nazis and yahoos.

But still questions go unanswered, appeals fall on deaf ears and the amnesty proceeds.
It has been suggested that Mr. Bush’s enthusiasm and support for the new “North American Union”, a political and economic entity structured along the lines of the European Union, might be one explanation for Mr. Bush’s seemingly impenetrable behavior. (2)

In a nutshell: Mr. Bush, Mr. Fox and Mr. Martin have announced their desire to “…help consolidate our efforts within a North American framework, to meet security and economic challenges, and promote the full potential of our people, by reducing regional disparities and increasing opportunities for all…” and to “…establish working parties led by our ministers and secretaries that will consult with stakeholders in our respective countries…”

Regional disparities like differing cultures and standards of living?

And are those disparities to be eliminated by politically appointed elites beyond the influence of the American people?

Well then, within the context of advancing a North American Union, Mr. Bush’s actions take on a clarity and purpose heretofore unimagined.

If the goal is to eliminate disparities and promote cross border movement of goods and labor, of what use is the sovereignty of the United States of America to Mr. Bush and his friends?

The question is how do we stop this man and his accomplices from stealing the country?

Yes, we can trudge off to our polling booths and vote for either the “Worse” candidate or the “God Awful” candidate, thereby guaranteeing more of the same.

Should we take on the Herculean task of ballot initiatives and referendums that are, more often than not, rendered moot by whatever circuit court has jurisdiction?

Should we call for his impeachment while Congressional Prima Donnas rail against the equal application of the laws against one of their own?

The betrayal, treasonous acts and crimes committed by Mr. Bush and our representatives demand harsher consequences than the loss of an election or impeachment.

And what are their plans for us after the next terrorist strike?

(1) http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs11/18862/gangs.htm
(2) http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15059
and: http://americas.irc-online.org/am/386
(3) http://www.mexidata.info/id436.html
and: http://www.spp.gov

Is it hell for Mexico to be without those persons who work at such low cost, or does their absence allow Mexico to enjoy a more relaxed lifestyle?

Senator Galindo scolds President Fox saying, “…Our radicalized, immigrant countrymen are in the U.S. because of the lack of opportunity in their own land. They need our support…now that they are to hold a huge demonstration on May1…he (Fox) should at least try to negotiate with the American political authorities to call off any brutal assault of more radical groups that might take part…” (1)

I’m not sure if the good senator is referring to the rabid reconquistas, spontaneous violence by some ad hoc group as a result of all those thousands of racist Latin Americans groping one another, our own security forces (who don’t arrest illegal alien demonstrators) or a cell phone-wielding Minuteman.

Apparently lack of clarity, electioneering and the inability to detect fact from fiction are desirable traits in the Mexican Senate too.

In an article entitled, ‘What we Mexicans can do to help the migrants” also in LaJornada, Gloria Munoz Ramirez writes, “…the protests (in the U.S.) have even been likened to the awakening of the Latino community from within the entrails of a monster…” and then explains, “…resistance in the United States has been constant ever since half our territory was stolen by the U. S. government…” (2)

Does the racism, hatred and arrogance displayed by these two represent the spirit of “Mexican Cooperation” in helping solve the illegal alien pandemic afflicting our nation?

And of course, you won’t find the term illegal alien anywhere in the aforementioned articles. Like our own elected officials, business, media and fantasy-based elites, the term “illegal alien” is “the term that dare not speak its name.”

American born Larry ‘Nativo’ Lopez, National President of the Mexican-American Political Association and an organizer of the up coming May Day Riots, is the delightful embodiment of that unrealistic prohibition.

In a recent interview, an hysterical Mr. Lopez responded to Lou Dobbs’ insensitive but accurate use of illegal aliens by shrieking, “…you don’t say kike, patty, w.o.p. Ok? You don’t say nigger…you’re using language that’s offensive to me and offensive to my people…don’t use that terminology to me again, referring to my people…”

Either Mr. Lopez lacks the intellectual dexterity to connect the term illegal alien with the legal status of millions of his Latin American compadres, or he rejects the term because of racial, tribal or national loyalties that supersede his American citizenship.

Mr. Nativo’s refusal to deal with the reality of illegal aliens as defined, the threats and intimidation he resorts to when confronted by that reality and the morally repugnant use of the term “my people” in justifying those threats make him little more than a Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wanna-be.

As for this “my people” noise, well, alarm bells should be ringing.

Americans are no strangers to the “my people” oratorio.

After decades of “my people” from the likes of Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, Al Sharpton et al, and the stupid, heavy handed solutions served up by profligate elites, we are burdened with race relations that are worse now then they ever were.

However, the mistakes we have made in trying to rectify the great inequities and injustices of racism within our own culture and nation do not extend to racist foreign nationals defiling our nation.

Mr. Nativo’s “people” are racist Latin American trespassers in a nation where they do not belong.

They threaten us with economic repercussions, and worse, if we, as a nation and a people, don’t cave in to their demands.

They have brought the violence and ignorance of their contemptible banana republics with them and expect us to acquiesce.

But they have no right to threaten or demand anything from American citizens in our own country.

The only “right” they have is safe passage back to their homeland.

Miss Ramirez blubbers and croaks about the awakening of the Latino community in the entrails of a monster.

She, Mr. Lopez and their illegal alien hordes, like ignorant thugs everywhere, have mistaken compassion, civility and the commitment to abide by society’s laws for weakness.

Illegal aliens would do well to start thinking about the awakening of the American citizens and the possible change in the quality of life for those illegal aliens as a result.

You can go home now.

I hear Latin America is lovely this time of year.

(1) http://www.watchingamerica.com/lajornada000042.shtml
(2) http://www.watchingamerica.com/lajornada000039.shtml

The passengers, and dozens if not hundreds of others, died when the planes slammed in to buildings and American soil. An unknown number of our countrymen hurled themselves to the pavement over 100 floors below rather than burn to death. The rest were mauled, devoured, their remains forever lost to us beneath the collapsed towers.

We forget the danger, the brute savagery of a world that crouches and snarls at our borders.

Recently a trailer for a movie about flight 93 was shown in a local movie house. On leaving the theater a woman, through her tears, was reported to have said, “It’s too soon, it’s too soon”

But she’s got it exactly wrong.

That movie, and dozens like it, should have been made 4 years and 6 months ago.

September 11, 2001 doesn’t represent the untimely demise of a beloved house pet that one “gets over”, something that one just deals with and moves on.

It was the vicious and cowardly slaughter of innocent Americans at the hands of Arab Muslim primitives too stupid and bestial to attribute the concept of innocence to anything non-Muslim.

That movie and dozens like it should have been required viewing for our children. So they would understand that the enemies of humankind, the true evil in this world emanates not from the United States, but from malignant states like Saudi Arabia, Syria, Russia, Palestine and Mexico.

They should have been made aware of the death and slaughter carried out at the behest of Mohammed, the beading pedophile and Muslim Idol.

Our children should have been exposed to the lies of Islam instead of homosexuality and the institutionalized racism of the “white skin baaaaaaad, dark skin good” effluvia that pimps itself off as education in this country.

Our talking heads should have interviewed western Islamic scholars, Islamic apostates and Christians who’ve suffered at the hands of their Muslim overlords rather than the terrorist supporting liars at the Council On American-Islamic Relations. Had they done so, we would have been on our guard against the signs of American dhimmitude and the subsequent taxpayer funded jizya now in play.

In the event that any of us were unclear as to what dhimmitude was, the aforementioned experts could have simply pointed to the trust fund baby currently occupying the White House.

America might be at war, but beyond the tiresome poll driven blather we’re occasionally subjected to, it is clear Bush is not.

In fact, his every action since taking office, including his ignoring Saudi involvement in 9/11, the resulting “religion of peace” lie and the White House mandated ineffectuality of the Department of Homeland Security, has been a calculated betrayal of this nation and it’s citizens.

But the most destructive and malevolent betrayal at the hands of Mr. Bush is his de facto surrender of American territory, territory that belongs to us, to the degenerate government of Mexico and it’s illegal aliens.

Mr. Bush steadfastly refuses to defend this nation and its citizens against its enemies.

Whether those enemies are hostile foreign nationals who threaten to bring our economy to a halt if their demands are not met, or Mr. Bush’s odious mendacity meant to convince the American people that a perverse and dangerous ideology committed to our destruction, Islam, is really a religion of peace.

Mr. Bush is, however, extremely interested in his own safety.

In April, 2005, when 16-year-old Jeff Neely threatened Mr. Bush and several U.S. Senators on an Internet forum, the President’s Secret Service was on the scene to insure the boy was locked up till Mr. Bush’s safety was assured. (1)

In February 2006, when a 13-year-old boy from Rhode Island wrote an essay threatening our Mr. Bush and Oprah Winfrey, the President’s Secret Service interrogated the child and assured Mr. Bush all was well. (2)

In March 2006, when yet another 13-year-old boy sent Mr. Bush threatening emails, not just the Secret Service but also the F.B.I. joined the fray. The pubescent was deemed neutralized and Mr. Bush breathed a sigh of relief. (3)

That a coward and a weakling kisses the feet of our enemies so they will spare him any discomfort is, in itself, unsurprising.

That the coward and weakling inhabits an elected office that we put him in is too much to bear.

Where oh where, in the great elected charnel house that we have loosed upon ourselves, is the statesman and patriot who will bring this plague of a president to account.

Is there no one?

(1) pittsburghlive.com
(2) boston.com
(3) breitbart.com

Where once high school and college students (and drop outs) could bus tables, scrub pots, flip burgers, move furniture or man a shovel, Mexican illegal aliens now fester.

When those young people pointed that fact out, their parents described the violence, hatred, ignorance and corruption that is, and has always been, the way of life in Mexico. Perhaps they said these illegal aliens are to be pitied, for theirs is a hard and brutish life.

Having said that, those parents no doubt suggested their children find employment elsewhere.

After all, we have so much to be thankful for, and those jobs are a first step, not a final destination.

The Mexican illegals smiled.

Word spread throughout the Mexican wasteland that the punk gringo would let his own blood do without before confronting their arrogant criminality.

Like taking candy from a baby.

Lacking the ability to innovate, bereft of even the most rudimentary moral foundation necessary for developing a society based on equality, justice or freedom, Mexico chooses to focus instead on their, and the St. Patricio Battalion’s, ignominious defeat at the hands of the United States 157 years ago.

So they continued to stream across our borders bringing their hatred, ignorance and wounded pride with them.

Candy wasn’t enough.

They took roofing jobs, dry walling jobs, truck driving jobs with bogus licenses, carpentry jobs, painting jobs, janitorial, hotel and restaurant jobs, all for a fraction of the going rate.

If they couldn’t institute the Plan of San Diego just yet, they could flood the market with their sub par skills and flood the country with their unwelcome and disinterested offspring.

As our government legislated the nation back down the evolutionary ladder, to accommodate the Mexican illegal aliens mired in their own bloody past, occasional alarms were sounded by individual Americans.

Americans who objected to having to conduct business in a language not their own, or Americans who objected to the special attention given to the children of invaders who exhibited no particular interest in education, while American children were ignored.

Over the years there was amnesty, the reshaping of congressional districts (to better represent the Mexican illegal aliens), in-state tuitions, the bankrupting of trauma centers, emergency rooms and hospitals, the resurgence of the plague and tuberculosis and the manipulation of laws and regulations in favor of illegal aliens.

Those same illegal aliens whose illegal and immoral presence in our country represents an unjust and parasitic imposition on American citizens.

And then 9/11 happened.

The normally docile and timid American citizens demanded protection and safety. They wanted border security.

It was at that precise moment that Mexico and its army of illegal aliens in the United States rose up on their hind legs and demanded the borders remain open and unregulated. Demanded more rights, more jobs, more educational opportunities, access to documents and identification and a path to American citizenship.

The American government was delighted at the prospect of further elevating their protected and much admired criminal element.

In response, American citizens bow and scrape, shuffle off to cast their votes for officials who have nothing but contempt for them and their children.

What a frightened and timid lot.

Even now, those elected charlatans pretend and play at addressing the illegal alien nightmare they themselves have unleashed upon the American citizen.

But it is no more than a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

When the founding fathers referred to a nation of laws, did they mean the unequal and perverted application of those laws in favor of foreign nationals illegally on our soil?

When they referred to the inalienable rights of the American citizen, did they really mean those rights could be waived by a profligate and amoral political class so as to bludgeon the American citizen into submission?

Did our patriots and veterans make their sacrifices so a degenerate and traitorous ruling class could maintain its death grip on our country?
Democrats and liberals would destroy us in their deranged quest for a government-enforced dystopia, while Republicans and conservatives would destroy us for a handful of dimes.

Without, Islam plans and continues its commitment to destroy us while our leaders offer them business opportunities in the heartland.

Within, the Mexican illegal alien awaits his opportunity.

The American citizens, despised by our own elected class, are now isolated and alone.

If we continue to support a government dedicated to our destruction, we are doomed.

Mr. Navarette thinks walls along the U.S.-Mexico border, denying citizenship to anchor babies or turning local police into “surrogate immigration agents” are all outlandish proposals.

In fact, Navarette considers those proposals no more than, “…tossing red meat to the mob…”

American citizens, who faxed, emailed, phoned and organized at the grass roots level, who are directly responsible for turning the normally timid and compliant Republicans into those fire breathers Navarette dismisses, and who availed themselves of the legal means at their disposal to achieve congressional response are, in Mr. Navarette’s keen analysis, no better than a mob.

I find this assertion a little puzzling.

Wouldn’t Hispanic illegal aliens who’ve jumped the borders and turned their collective backs on the laws, morals and social customs of the country in which they hide, and whose crime rate is disproportionately high to boot, be a more accurate description of a mob?

I think it would.

So why would Mr. Navarette, a Harvard graduate, so notably misapply the term?

The answer becomes apparent once we figure out who comprises that mob he refers to.
And I don’t think Mr. Navarette is referring to the Chinese, Jamaicans or Hmong.

Rather, I believe Mr. Navarette, his illegal alien and business friends, the Catholic church, MALDEF, LULAC and other race based organizations know exactly who’s in that mob.

And the mob is us. Those of us of European and African descent. You know, Americans.

But the Hispanic race card trumps all others.

The problem in adhering to an ideology based on race is the inherent separatist and exclusionary nature of the beast.

It is in fact, no more than a tribal mentality that lends itself to suspicion, hatred and excess. As such, it impedes innovation, creativity and the progress to a just society.

The U.S. Constitution affirms the right of all its citizens to succeed or fail within its uniquely American context irrespective of race, creed or religion.

Nowhere does it promote the rights of one race, creed or religion over another.

Nor does it grant special rights, privileges or immunity from the laws to illegal aliens.

Yet our politicians, businesses and unaccountable judiciary continue to grant those illegitimate rights, privileges and immunities to more than 20 million illegal aliens, of whom we know nothing.

This fact should be of concern to all Americans.

That the same group heaps special favor upon the 11-12 million Mexican illegal aliens is further proof that our government cannot be trusted to execute the laws with impartiality, and cannot be entrusted with the safety of the American people.

The Mexican illegal aliens, with no concept of our Constitution or individual rights, beyond their “right” to free medical care and schooling for their offspring, introduce and impose their third world culture within our borders.

Just as all things are not of equal worth, so all cultures are not of equal worth.

The history of the United States is a proud one. The accomplishments as a result of our adherence to equal justice before the law and the commitment to individual rights has given humankind some of its greatest gifts and technological advances.

In the same period, Mexican contributions to humankind have been largely nonexistent.

Mexican cuisine doesn’t justify their illegal presence in the country. Saving contractors, meatpackers and restaurants a few dollars an hour in salaries doesn’t justify our descent into third world status.

It is worth noting that the Mexicans, in their racial hatred of us, don’t feel their actions are criminal or immoral. They erroneously believe our country belongs to them. They consider their illegal and unwelcome presence here to be a duty. Their frightened government assures them they are patriots in the fight for their land.

They are dangerously deluded.

By encouraging them, our elected officials and judiciary not only diminish American citizenship; they attempt to eliminate our rich and proud history by imposing a foreign culture and language upon us.

Promoting and enforcing Hispanic racial solidarity over the constitution and the equal application of the law is not only criminal it is suicide.

Mr. Bush and friends may very well continue to ignore us as thousands more illegal aliens cross into our country daily.

He and his elected friends may delay and obfuscate, as is their wont.

But the time is fast approaching when he will either support his Mexican friends or us.

It is incumbent upon Americans to speak out against this perversion of our laws, constitution and culture.

The Democrats, whom we will call our enemies for the sake of this argument, consider the sum of all evil to be American Citizens who stubbornly cling to an increasingly irrelevant constitution, and who demand accountability and legislation based on reasoned discourse and the study of facts.

Typically, Democratic response to those demands result in our being buried under a mountain of egalitarian mandates that would make Lenin runny with envy.

In matters of national security, the Democrats are at a fundamental loss. The idea of defending the very thing they despise, the American Citizen, compels an almost instinctual revulsion that more often than not results in hysterical accusations of Islamophobia and strident demands for tighter gun control laws.

They haven’t a clue.

That these same democrats, who rode the crest of the anti-war/anti-America hysteria of the 60’s and 70’s into cultural dominance, chose to run a confessed war criminal in the last presidential election indicates a profound lack of even marginal human morality.

However, it is worth remembering that 48% of the American people voted the Democratic ticket in that election.

Dishonesty, self-hatred and self-deception of that magnitude cannot be so easily dismissed, the derision of Rove and Bush notwithstanding.

If we grant the Republicans the honor of being our friends in the above truism, we are forced to admit that they have been no less destructive and indifferent to our demands, no less destructive in intent or execution.

For example: In the aftermath of 9/11 Mr. Bush boldly proclaimed those responsible would be brought to justice, but he couldn’t bring himself to apply any aspect of that bold proclamation to the Saudis, whose citizens were overwhelmingly represented in the contingent responsible for the deaths of 3,000 Americans.

Nor could he force himself to terminate the State Department’s irresponsible and dangerous Visa Express program that provided unfettered access to the American heartland for Saudi residents.

Within the context of that bold commitment, one could have reasonably expected Mr. Bush to marshal the considerable resources and manpower at his disposal to secure our borders, ports of entry and airports. After all, we had suffered a devastating attack with, as far as we knew, more to follow.

Alas, Mr. Bush’s response was the tried and true response of bureaucrats everywhere: create an even bigger and more inefficient department that will do even less.

Hence, we have Mr. Bush’s Department of Homeland Security.

That department’s inability and unwillingness to perform part of its mission by securing our borders was exposed by 900 American Citizens last April.

Even today, while the Customs and Border Patrol “reaches out” to the private sector for help with its new and improved Secure Border Initiative, Mr. Bush remains vehemently opposed to any border security whatsoever.

Thanks to Mr. Bush, the CBP has admitted it cannot do the job for which it was created.

We owe Mr. Bush a debt of gratitude for his unwavering support of the Dubai ports deal too.

His treason and dhimmitude aside, the focus on our lack of container and port security should enable us to institute procedures that will help keep us safe, rather than help his Muslim bosses make money off our potential demise.

Perhaps the “Keep your friends close, your enemies closer” saying is misapplied.

Mr. Bush will lay claim to the fact that we’ve not been attacked since 9/11.

Unfortunately we will be attacked, and it will be a direct result of Mr. Bush’s actions.

There are (at least) two ways that this can occur.

The first possibility will be at the merciful conclusion of his disastrous tenure in the white house.

His successor will have the option of continuing Bush’s policies of bribery and payoffs to the same Muslim thugs who have brought the EU to its knees.

Should the payoffs continue we will be safe. For a time.

Should his successor express no interest in dhimmitude, we will be attacked.

Either way, Mr. Bush and his Republicans can, and no doubt will, claim he kept America safe.

The second, and more likely eventuality is far more ugly.

It would involve an attack as a result of any impeachment proceedings.

I’m not the first to point this out, but when the Republicans are swept from office by an outraged and betrayed populace, impeachment becomes an almost certainty.

Mr. Bush is a petty, vindictive and stupid man. In essence, he is an indifferent potentate, similar to his Muslim friends, in manner and attitude.

He would not take kindly to those proceedings.

His response would be suitably dangerous and unreasoned.

Whatever his response might entail, one of the results is sure be dead Americans.

Well, I suppose that’s one campaign issue the Republicans can run on this year.

The real problem with the Dubai sell out is not that it’s just one more slimy backroom deal at the hands of rapacious white house globalists.

Nor is it the fragmented haste and calculated stealth of the vetting process, or even Mr. Bush’s specious claims that he was ignorant of the deal.

Mr. Bush nominated a chief executive of Dubai Port World, David Sanborn, to run the Transportation Department’s Maritime Division in January. Did he forget?

If Mr. Bush really wasn’t aware of the deal, then he’s out of the loop within his own administration. If he was aware, he’s lying now.

We can take little comfort in either of these alternatives.

No, the real problem with this latest bit of treason is the politically correct strictures that prevent us from even addressing the real problem: the Arab Muslim and the yoke of Islam.

A perfect example of this PC timidity is Mrs. Clinton’s preposterous threat to initiate legislation that would ban all foreign involvement in our port facilities.

Mrs. Clinton knows any such legislation would never see the light of day. Still, she is infinitely more at ease with the prospect of severing business ties with current foreign governments, governments that pose little or no security threat, rather than insult the UAE.

One wonders what makes the UAE, one of a long line of Arab Muslim kingdoms that have aided and funded some of the most savage crimes committed against the west in the past decade, worthy of such proprieties.

Mr. Bush and friends insist the UAE are now our allies and indignantly proclaim any opposition to the Bush clan’s never-ending quest for more money to be racist and xenophobic. They scold us with the “not all Muslims are terrorists” nonsense as if we were incapable of reaching that conclusion ourselves.

The good Muslim bad Muslim argument is no more than PC diversion for those more concerned with showcasing their own enlightened attitudes than troubling themselves with investigating the bloodied history of Islam and Mohamed.

That those “good” Muslims they twitter about are viewed as apostates, and live their lives under a death sentence imposed by those “bad” Muslims, never enters the PC realm.

We are in a war. This war began 26 years ago in Tehran.

Generals, commanders, military theorists and strategists all say the best victory is a bloodless one.

A smart adversary will use treachery, bribery, threats, intimidation, misinformation, lies and betrayal to achieve the desired results. He will host Internet sites, buy shares of media outlets and transportation hubs, show extreme generosity to politicians and their kin, and shower pundits with all the praise and esteem that rightfully belong to others to ensure his ultimate victory.

In the case of Islam victory means the conversion of the west to Islam or its heavily taxed subjugation. Conversion or dhimmitude.

Because this or that pundit, columnist or talking head claims to have studied the issue in great detail and decided their president is correct in his hysterical defense of an Arab Muslim presence in our ports simply means that individual, like the president, refuses to take the Islamic threat to our existence seriously.

Koran8.12: When thy Lord inspired the angels, (saying): I am with you. So make those who believe stand firm. I will throw fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Then smite the necks and smite of them each finger.

That quaint and charming reference to smiting is, in this particular passage, beheading and dismemberment.

Is allah speaking to good Muslims or bad Muslims here?

The (not completely) bloodless tactics of threats, bribes and intimidation, referred to above, have worked.

The EU has succumbed to the intimidation and threats. They have pledged themselves to a better understanding of Islam as a result of their insensitivity in the Mohammed cartoon nastiness.

The term Islamophobe is an invention of CAIR. In using the term, Mr. Bush’s allies dutifully mouth the words of those who would destroy us.

Commitments to the destruction of the nation with an open borders policy, coupled with feeble attempts at national security indicate the Muslim strategies of bribery, treachery and betrayal have found a friend in Mr. Bush.

No amount of PC drivel can hide that fact.

Koran33.61: Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.

As if on cue, the Dubai duplicity bubbled and roiled out of the caldron.

Now, Americans who oppose this latest example of White House intransigence are being subjected to the same sort of hysteria and name calling, from Republican partisans, that the liberals and Democrats have become infamous for.

Xenophobic and racist, epithets heretofore reserved for those objecting to Bush’s support of a suicidal open borders policy, are now bestowed upon Americans who object to an Islamic presence at our ports.

Apparently these Republicans are unconcerned about the murderous xenophobia and racism against Jews, Christians and non-Muslims perpetrated by the Muslims they are currently enamored of.

Like the liberals and the Democrats, Republican acolytes now tell us we just don’t understand the nuanced complexities of this latest globalization shaft. Our stubborn refusal to embrace the presence of our enemies on our own soil might result in hurt feelings. They insist we are isolationists and isolationism is bad for commerce.

In what has to be one of the most disgusting and outrageous statements ever uttered, Republicans and their hacks point out that the Brits, the very definition of steadfast ally for well over a century that includes two world wars, are just as prone to terrorist attack and therefore no less vulnerable or suspect, in operating our ports, as the Muslims of the UAE would be. They cite Richard Reid and the subway bombings to illustrate their point.

For Republicans, like Democrats, allies can be bartered, sold or discarded for whatever is expedient.

Republican stalwarts are now shouting that Democrat opposition to the Dubai port deal is no more than an election year ploy to garner attention and votes for this coming November.

But it’s an election year for the Republicans too isn’t it? How else to explain the high drama of HR 4437, a bill that will surely meet an ugly end, if not in the Senate, then certainly at the hand of Mr. Bush’s newly discovered veto pen.

Certainly there is animosity and resentment, and it is not only on both sides of the isle. The same applies to the pundits, partisans, chattering classes and the rest of us. However, shouldn’t Republicans be joining forces with Democrats instead of obstructing the will of the American people in trying to stop a president who becomes more and more imperial with each passing day? These same politicians managed to work together long enough to give themselves raises and pass bills dripping bacon grease. What’s the problem?

Surely there is legitimate cause for concern.

We have a president who feels Islam needs to be flattered, placated and bribed so they’ll like us when a horizontal butt stroke would be far more efficacious.

Think not?

In February 1982, the Muslim Brotherhood, a notorious terrorist group, led a major insurrection in Hama, Syria rapidly taking control of the city. Hafez al-Assad , President of Syria, responded by bombing Hama throughout the rest of the month, killing between 10,000 and 30,000 people. This marked the end of Muslim Brotherhood savagery in Syria.

For Islam, murder, massacre and genocide are all legitimate tools in the governing toolbox.

Trying to befriend people like this is like going into a cage full of plague infested rats wearing a cheese coat with “moron” written across your forehead.

Mr. Bush and his Republicans are frightened at the prospect of lost monies? Perhaps they’re concerned Islam might take it’s business elsewhere?

Well, in an op ed piece in the Saudi Arabian ‘Arab News’ titled ‘Nice Doggie’, Amr Al-Faisal adjusts his skirts and huffs, “…Ever since the US began its so-called war on terror billions of dollars of investments belonging to Arabs and Muslims have fled the US economy. The main beneficiaries of this capital flight have been European countries…”

In light of the French Muslim riots, the Muslim cartoon riots, the Muslim subway bombings and the Muslim butchery of Theo Van Gogh; is the fleeing of Saudi blood money a bad thing? And wouldn’t the sun shine a little bit brighter if the Saudis themselves were to flee our shores? Forever?

Our Republicans and Democrats need to show the American people they can get beyond these internecine squabbles and focus on the real issue at hand. And that issue is our survival.

Would we hand over operation of our airports to Muslims? Nope.

Why are our ports any less critical?

http://bellicoseboyo.com/