<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>American Conservative News Politics &#038; Opinion - The Land of the Free &#187; Doug Hagin</title>
	<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net</link>
	<description>The Land of the Free presents articles and news about the world and the United States from a conservative, libertarian and classical liberal point of view.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Why Does the Senate NOT Want Energy Solutions?</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/06/03/why-does-the-senate-not-want-energy-solutions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/06/03/why-does-the-senate-not-want-energy-solutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hagin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[American Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism, Marxism &#038; Communism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/06/03/why-does-the-senate-not-want-energy-solutions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee summoned top executives to Capitol Hill, to explain why gas prices are so darned high, and most importantly in their minds, to make themselves seem important, righteously indignant, and to convince Americans that they are looking out for us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee summoned top executives to Capitol Hill, to explain why gas prices are so darned high, and most importantly in their minds, to make themselves seem important, righteously indignant, and to convince Americans that they are looking out for us.</p>
<p>Among those executives summoned were Robert Malone, Chairman and President of BP America, Inc.; John Hofmeister, President, Shell Oil Company; Peter Robertson, Vice Chairman of the Board, Chevron Corporation; John Lowe, Executive Vice President, Conoco Philips Company; and Stephen Simon, Senior Vice President, Exxon Mobil Corporation. In addition, <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/22/gaseous-bipartisan-demagoguery-from-the-dems-and-mccain/">as Michelle Malkin points out</a>, these men stole the show. <a href="http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/06/03/why-does-the-senate-not-want-energy-solutions/#more-4092" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/06/03/why-does-the-senate-not-want-energy-solutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and His Bitter Church</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/03/26/obama-and-his-bitter-church/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/03/26/obama-and-his-bitter-church/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hagin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Elections &amp; Voting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Democrats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism, Marxism &#038; Communism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/03/26/obama-and-his-bitter-church/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big speech in Philadelphia for Barack Obama today (March 18). Big for what it could mean for his presidential hopes, which had been going very well, until his pastor‘s rants tripped him up. Perhaps even for race relations in America, if Obama himself is to be believed, which, given his recent battles with honesty, might be a stretch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big speech in Philadelphia for Barack Obama today (March 18). Big for what it could mean for his presidential hopes, which had been going very well, until his pastor‘s rants tripped him up. Perhaps even for race relations in America, if Obama himself is to be believed, which, given his recent battles with honesty, might be a stretch.</p>
<p>For those who are not aware of why Barack Obama felt compelled to give a major speech on race in America, a quick review. Obama and his family are members of a Black church in Chicago. The Trinity United Church of Christ has a few problems with its long-time, recently retired pastor, Jeremiah Wright. It seems that Reverend Wright is quick to throw around wild accusations and racist sermons.His more infamous rants include his accusing the United States of sponsoring terrorism around the world, and of giving drugs to Black Americans, and of lying about Pearl Harbor. He continually denigrates the USA for being a racist country, built on racism, calling America “The United States of KKKAmerica”! He has been caught bashing White people on video numerous times as well. His most despicable rant might have been the time he said America deserved 9-11. In this demented racist’s mind, we are no different from al Qaeda, and 9-11 was simply our chickens coming home to roost. <a href="http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/03/26/obama-and-his-bitter-church/#more-3761" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/03/26/obama-and-his-bitter-church/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armed Americans in National Parks? YES!</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/03/04/armed-americans-in-national-parks-yes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/03/04/armed-americans-in-national-parks-yes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hagin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism &#038; Libertarianism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/03/04/armed-americans-in-national-parks-yes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a storm brewing in America. The storm is over controversial issues, gun rights, and gun control. This saga will play out in the next weeks, or months, or a year, who knows. At issue is whether American citizens ought to be allowed to exercise their constitutional rights by carrying their firearms in America’s national parks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a storm brewing in America. The storm is over controversial issues, gun rights, and gun control. This saga will play out in the next weeks, or months, or a year, who knows. At issue is whether American citizens ought to be allowed to exercise their constitutional rights by carrying their firearms in America’s national parks.</p>
<p>Now of course, this is a hot button issue, and it has so far been filled with the same anti-gun rhetoric proponents of self-defense and the Second Amendment have heard for decades now. <a href="http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/03/04/armed-americans-in-national-parks-yes/#more-3659" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/03/04/armed-americans-in-national-parks-yes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain? Are You Serious?</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/02/16/mccain-are-you-serious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/02/16/mccain-are-you-serious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hagin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Elections &amp; Voting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism &#038; Libertarianism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics In General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/02/16/mccain-are-you-serious/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OH BOY! Am I dreaming, or is John McCain going to be the GOP nominee for president? Please tell me I am dreaming and wake me up, please! Senator McAmnesty? Senator Gang of 14? Senator Tax Cuts for the Rich? How did this befall Conservatives in 2008? After the 2006 elections we Conservatives made it clear we were tired of being shortchanged by the GOP didn’t we. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH BOY! Am I dreaming, or is John McCain going to be the GOP nominee for president? Please tell me I am dreaming and wake me up, please! Senator McAmnesty? Senator Gang of 14? Senator Tax Cuts for the Rich? How did this befall Conservatives in 2008? After the 2006 elections we Conservatives made it clear we were tired of being shortchanged by the GOP didn’t we. Tired of sellouts, RINO’s, and moderates. Surely, we would get a great candidate in 2008 wouldn’t we? Surely, we would not allow the next nominee to be one of the most glaring examples of our frustration with the GOP. Surely, we would not be stuck, yet again, with holding our noses while voting yet, here we are. <a href="http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/02/16/mccain-are-you-serious/#more-3553" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/02/16/mccain-are-you-serious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning how to DRIVE in Election Season</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/01/25/learning-how-to-drive-in-election-season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/01/25/learning-how-to-drive-in-election-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hagin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Elections &amp; Voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/01/25/learning-how-to-drive-in-election-season/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK my friends, the races for the GOP and Democratic nominations are up in the air. We could, as of now, end up with any one of eight different presidents. Watching the blogs, the main stream media, the polls, the focus groups, and the bloated talking heads, and listening to talk radio, I have imagined how very tough it might be for young voters to decipher which way to vote.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK my friends, the races for the GOP and Democratic nominations are up in the air. We could, as of now, end up with any one of eight different presidents. Watching the blogs, the main stream media, the polls, the focus groups, and the bloated talking heads, and listening to talk radio, I have imagined how very tough it might be for young voters to decipher which way to vote.</p>
<p>There are literally a hundred opinions, some even coming from reliable sources, directing us to vote for this candidate, or NOT vote for that candidate. It is quite a challenge to vote the right way, and not be unduly influenced by all of these forces of bloviation and spin. <a href="http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/01/25/learning-how-to-drive-in-election-season/#more-3391" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2008/01/25/learning-how-to-drive-in-election-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Thompson Border Security Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/11/05/the-thompson-border-security-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/11/05/the-thompson-border-security-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hagin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Republicans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/11/05/the-thompson-border-security-plan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Fred Thompson officially entered the presidential playoffs, I have been fascinated by some of the criticisms of him by the media, and even by some Conservatives. You know the main card played against Thompson has been the lazy card. Lazy? No, Thompson is laid back; he is not a rah-rah kind of person. Frankly, I enjoy that about him. I have worked with many rah-rah types and many laid-back types as well. Give me the steady, calm, laid back person any day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Fred Thompson officially entered the presidential playoffs, I have been fascinated by some of the criticisms of him by the media, and even by some Conservatives. You know the main card played against Thompson has been the lazy card. Lazy? No, Thompson is laid back; he is not a rah-rah kind of person. Frankly, I enjoy that about him. I have worked with many rah-rah types and many laid-back types as well. Give me the steady, calm, laid back person any day. <a href="http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/11/05/the-thompson-border-security-plan/#more-2837" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/11/05/the-thompson-border-security-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>30 things Conservatives Know</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/08/31/30-things-conservatives-know/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/08/31/30-things-conservatives-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hagin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism &#038; Libertarianism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured Conservative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/08/31/30-things-conservatives-know/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1- America was founded upon the principle that we are Created, by a Creator, and our liberties are bestowed upon us by that Creator. It is not necessary to be a believer to be a Conservative, BUT Conservatives do realize that America was founded upon this principle all the same.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1- America was founded upon the principle that we are Created, by a Creator, and our liberties are bestowed upon us by that Creator. It is not necessary to be a believer to be a Conservative, BUT Conservatives do realize that America was founded upon this principle all the same.<br />
2- Conservative realize that the liberties we enjoy come not from any governmental body. The government can protect liberty, as our Constitution states, it cannot, however, grant liberty.<br />
3- Far from relying upon government too grant our freedoms, Conservatives realize government, no matter how liberal tends to erode liberty and restrict freedom. <a href="http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/08/31/30-things-conservatives-know/#more-2426" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/08/31/30-things-conservatives-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Collectivist Left vs The Individualist Right!</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/08/10/the-collectivist-left-vs-the-individualist-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/08/10/the-collectivist-left-vs-the-individualist-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hagin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism &#038; Libertarianism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism, Marxism &#038; Communism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/08/10/the-collectivist-left-vs-the-individualist-right/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are several significant differences between the ideological right and left. We all know this. Abortion, taxation, the size of government, national defense, gun control, etc are all issues that divide the two ideologies. We all are well aware of these specific issues and the way the two sides generally view them. What is interesting, to me anyway, is why the two sides differ on these and other issues. I have come to believe there is a common theme that divides the two ideologies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several significant differences between the ideological right and left. We all know this. Abortion, taxation, the size of government, national defense, gun control, etc are all issues that divide the two ideologies. We all are well aware of these specific issues and the way the two sides generally view them. What is interesting, to me anyway, is why the two sides differ on these and other issues. I have come to believe there is a common theme that divides the two ideologies.</p>
<p>While the specific issues already cited separate the two sides, there is, I believe, one major difference that coves all these issues. The difference is in the thinking of the two sides. What they think, is best explained in how they think. In short, the left thinks collectively, while the right thinks individually. <a href="http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/08/10/the-collectivist-left-vs-the-individualist-right/#more-2322" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/08/10/the-collectivist-left-vs-the-individualist-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defending Fred Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/07/15/defending-fred-thompson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/07/15/defending-fred-thompson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hagin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Republicans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Academia, Media &#038; Hollywood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/07/15/defending-fred-thompson/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who knows me knows I am strongly supporting Fred Thompson for president of the United States. I have laid out my reasons in previous columns. In short, I believe Thompson is a true Conservative, His record shows that, his recent speeches and columns prove it as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who knows me knows I am strongly supporting Fred Thompson for president of the United States. I have laid out my reasons in previous columns. In short, I believe Thompson is a true Conservative, His record shows that, his recent speeches and columns prove it as well. I have nothing but confidence in this man to be not only a great pick for the GOP, but, I also believe he can defeat Hillary next November, and let us be very honest here, Hillary Clinton WILL BE the Democratic nominee. Thompson, is, in my view a man that can both excite the conservative base and reach middle of the road voters as well. That is a recipe for success my friends.</p>
<p>There is little doubt this nation is in desperate need of real conservative leadership, frankly, we all know no Democrat running can provide that leadership. All they seem to have is defeatism, despair, and their same old neo-Marxist ideals that have never worked and can never work. Frankly speaking, a Democrat in the White House would be a disaster for America in every way. We, as Conservatives know this<br />
.<br />
Last night, while updating my website, I came across a column by a man named Richard Viguerie. In that column, Mr. Viguerie expressed little faith that Thompson is even a Conservative at all. Willing to listen to any challenges to Thompson’s credentials, and with an open mind, I read the column, and frankly, it looked far more like a Michael Moore hit piece than anything written by a reasonable man with genuine concerns. In short, it was pathetic.</p>
<p>Let us look at some of the objections raised by Mr. Viguerie to Fred Thompson’s conservatism shall we?</p>
<p>First off, Viguerie plays the “Fred is lazy” card. “Rumors circulated that Thompson was lazy, uninterested in the daily grind that comes with being a Senator—and one can understand that Capitol Hill is a lot more tedious and less glamorous than a Hollywood movie lot. More important were Thompson’s failures of will and his lack of leadership on any legislation that would promote the conservative cause. Instead what little leadership we got from Thompson advanced the liberal Establishment agenda.”</p>
<p>Hmmm, well I fail to see any Liberal agenda items Thompson advanced. Viguerie certainly fails to list any, except to express his dissatisfaction with the results of Thompson’s investigation into Bill Clinton’s fundraising scandal. Yes, I wish Clinton had been brought to account for this too. However, blaming Thompson for this is flat wrong.</p>
<p>Another problem Viguerie has with Thompson is his failure to be critical enough of the expansion of the federal government by President Bush. Apparently, Mr. Viguerie has been too busy trying to sell his new book to watch or listen to the numerous clips of Thompson talking repeatedly about fixing Washington. Hearing the disapproval Fred Thompson holds for the big spending ways of Washington is pretty easy to do. One can listen to many examples on my site at the Fred Thompson 2008 page. Now, Thompson has not gone around pounding lecterns and ranting like a lunatic about how the government is spending far too much. He has, though, expressed his views on lowering taxes, reforming the tax code, and of course reducing the size and spending of the government, in a very thoughtful and eloquent fashion. Mr. Viguerie should pay closer attention.</p>
<p>Yet another complaint about Thompson according to Viguerie is that he does not have enough “long-time conservative activists” surrounding him. Hmmm, I know there are hundreds of bloggers who are championing Fred Thompson as the man for 2008. I know of many columnists, like JB Williams, Edward Daley, many others, and myself who are solidly behind Thompson. I know many Conservatives who will be very happy when Fred enters the race. Do we not count? Are we not Conservatives? Is our lack of name recognition enough for Mr. Viguerie? Well Mr. Viguerie allow me to introduce us, we are the Conservatives of the United States of America. You might try listening to us.</p>
<p>Next up, let us look at the most asinine criticism Mr. Viguerie offers up. Apparently, we should reject Fred Thompson because he knows Howard Baker! Moreover, it turns out, Thompson also knows Lamar Alexander! Well, hell, get out the tar and feathers! Come on, what is this an 8th grade class? We cannot support Thompson because he is friends with Howard Baker. Thompson knows many people; he ought to be judged on HIS ideals, not theirs. What dastardly secrets will Mr. Viguerie reveal about Thompson next? Perhaps he shook hands with a Democrat or two while he served in the Senate? Or maybe he actually spoke with Democrats! Oh, the horror!</p>
<p>Finally, Mr. Viguerie attempts to deceive us on Senator Thompson’s voting record. In his column, Viguerie claims Thompson voted against impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton. Well, no, sorry, Mr. Viguerie, but, while Thompson did vote against one article he voted FOR the others. A fact Mr. Viguerie conveniently forgot to include it seems.</p>
<p>Throughout his column/please buy my book/I hate Fred Thompson piece Mr. Viguerie references the American Conservative Union’s ratings of US Senators as proof that Fred Thompson is no Conservative. Well I looked at his ratings, and they were overwhelmingly positive.</p>
<p>You can check them out as well <a href="http://www.acuratings.org">www.acuratings.org</a>. You can also read the entire column by <a href="http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&#038;CMSCategoryID=19">Mr. Viguerie here</a> and please stop by my Fred Thompson page at <a href="http://www.gatorsense.com/id15.html">http://www.gatorsense.com/id15.html</a>.  See or yourself my friends.</p>
<p>I do not know exactly why the Richard Viguerie dislikes Thompson, perhaps it is some personal issue, and perhaps he is genuine in his concern. All I know is that he offers very little reason not to support Fred Thompson in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/07/15/defending-fred-thompson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration: Enforcement First THEN Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/06/27/immigration-enforcement-first-then-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/06/27/immigration-enforcement-first-then-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hagin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics In General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/06/27/immigration-enforcement-first-then-reform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This whole immigration bill debate has been a true beating hasn’t it. Having Republicans like columnist Linda Chavez, Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, Senators Trent Lott and Lindsey Graham, and even President Bush bash Conservatives who opposed the bill was a blast. These folks characterized us as people who either “did not like Mexicans”, or “thought that anything short of the death penalty is amnesty”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole immigration bill debate has been a true beating hasn’t it. Having Republicans like columnist Linda Chavez, Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, Senators Trent Lott and Lindsey Graham, and even President Bush bash Conservatives who opposed the bill was a blast. These folks characterized us as people who either “did not like Mexicans”, or “thought that anything short of the death penalty is amnesty”, or were just out of touch with reality. Senator Lott even opined that it was the fault of talk radio, which he seems to believe, is running America. It is not very nice to be on the receiving end of cheap shots by your supposed ideological allies is it?</p>
<p>We Conservatives did not let that get us down; instead, we were emboldened by these asinine attacks. We called, and wrote, and emailed or political leaders. And, thankfully, we killed the immigration/amnesty bill! Good for us! Of course, it is alive again and very soon, it will be front and center again. Oddly enough, many of our congressmen and senators do not understand why America is so outraged over them trying to fix our immigration policies. <a href="http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/06/27/immigration-enforcement-first-then-reform/#more-2103" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservativeopinion/2007/06/27/immigration-enforcement-first-then-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
