Is Giuliani a good choice for America?

Let’s just ignore the fact that he’s more liberal than many Democrats. After all, he’s pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-secularism, anti-religion, pro-gun control, pro-big government, pro-high taxes, pro-globalism, pro-interventionist, and has had numerous extramarital affairs. Let’s, however, look at his stance on the third-world invasion of America.

Rudolph Giuliani has gone out of his way to support the third-world invasion of the United States. He has brought lawsuits to secure government subsidies for illegals. He has supported blanket amnesties, handouts, welfare, special privileges, free public schooling, free health care, and a whole hose of other special benefits for the third-world invaders of America. In short, Rudolph Giuliani is a better friend to illegals than to hard-working Americans.

But yet neocons and liberal Republicans say that we should vote for him because he is “patriotic”. Is he?

Like Bill Kristol, Giuliani holds the following inconsistent positions.

(1) Giuliani thinks that we should spend billions of US taxpayers’ dollars to secure the borders of Israel and deport foreigners from Iraq

and

(2) he simultaneously supports the open-borders, third-world invasion of the USA.

And this man is “patriotic”? Is this, or is this not, treason?

Have Republicans lost their minds?

——-
William H. Calhoun is a writer, paleoconservative, farmer on his ancestral estate, and a graduate of the University of Chicago. He can be reached at williamhcalhoun@yahoo.com

Two things, though, Brownback always fails to mention are (1) Reagan later said that the 1986 amnesty was the worst mistake of his life, and (2) there is no way that Reagan could win California today (for Gov. or Pres.) because of demographic changes expedited by his own general amnesty.

As Senator Sam Brownback (“Amnesty Sam,” as National Review has called him) contemplates his run, conservatives should think real hard about his record. Is this really the kind of man we want in office?

Sen. Brownback has a horrendous record on immigration. He is about two miles to the Left of most Democrats . Americans for Better Immigration gives him a overall grade of D. On reducing chain migration, he receives an F-; on reducing visa lotteries, F-; on reducing unnecessary visas, F-; and on reducing amnesties, F.

Sam Brownback is no friend to hard-working Americans. He has tossed aside law and order and, like Barack Obama, has sold out the American middle class in the hope of pandering to 20 million illegals. Brownback has not only refused to stop the third-world invasion of America, he has done much to encourage it.

Brownback allegedly has ties with Opus Dei, which has been called “conservative,” but really is not. It is comprised of third-world radicals intent on invading the first world, and Brownback has apparently been swayed by their rhetoric. These globalists and their anti-Kirkian ideology resemble Marxists more than traditional conservatives. Unlike traditional secret societies in Europe that emphasize European Blood and Soil or European Kith and Kin, Opus Dei is a rag-tag band of third-world parasites intent on taking over America.

But Brownback is up to his ears in liberal internationalism. Unlike traditional conservatives who recognize that different forms of government are more appropriate for different cultures, Sam Brownback supports the Jacobin transformation of the world to liberal democracy. He, furthermore, in the name of “human rights” (a liberal creation), wants the US to become even more interventionist and go into Darfur. (I suppose while our boys are dying in Darfur it will be even easier for Brownback’s hordes to invade America.)

Amnesty Sam also supports free trade, despite the fact that we now have the largest free-trade deficit in the world. Historically, conservatives have opposed free trade, and they should. It is destroying our economy and undermining our sovereignty. Many in the GOP, however, like Brownback, have been “neoconned” on this issue.

Given the recent GOP defeat, the Republicans should choose a strong anti-immigration presidential candidate, like Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo or Duncan Hunter.

But Brownback is not alone in his betrayal of America. John McCain, Rudolph Giuliani, Condoleezza Rice, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Mike Huckabee are just as bad. They all, despite their rhetoric, support the third-world invasion of the United States.

Real conservatives will choose patriots like Paul or Tancredo, not a backslider like Brownback.

In short, Sam Brownback is no friend to conservatives. He has sided with the treasonous pro-amnesty lobby, and he actively has supported the third-world invasion of America. Fifty years ago this would be called “treason,” but today Brownback says it is “conservatism.” Don’t be fooled by Amnesty Sam’s rhetoric. He is a liberal globalist and should be avoided like the plague.

——-
William H. Calhoun is a paleoconservative, a writer, and a graduate of the University of Chicago. He can be reached at williamhcalhoun@yahoo.com

All three of these men oppose the third-world invasion of America, and all three are skeptical of free trade. In general, any real conservative will oppose the third-world invasion of the United States; and, historically and philosophically, conservatives have wisely opposed free trade. It is destroying our economy and undermining our national sovereignty.

Tom Tancredo is a forerunner in the anti-immigration movement, given a grade of A by Americans for Better Immigration (ABI), and the founding member of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus. Tancredo is pro-life, pro-values, and pro-religion. Although previously in favor of free trade, he recently has become more skeptical of it, and has been a harsh critic of the NAFTA superhighway. He has one of the largest grass-roots support networks of any member of Congress.

Duncan Hunter, a California Congressman, was the former chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. He opposes amnesty for illegals and receives a grade of B+ by ABI. He is pro-life, pro-values, and pro-religion. He also is a harsh critic of free trade and our trade deficit, which could be his selling point. He currently has a son, a Lieutenant in the Marines, serving in Iraq.

Ron Paul, a Texas Congressman, is a paleolibertarian (and Libertarian Party presidential nominee in 1998), but also has been classified as a “paleoconservative,” “conservative Constitutionalist,” or “fusionist,” and has general conservative / libertarian appeal. Ron Paul is opposed to amnesty, and receives a grade of B+ by ABI. He is pro-Constitution, pro-small government, pro-states rights, pro-religion, pro-values, pro-life and wants to return to the states the legality of abortion. Paul also has become skeptical of free trade and the NAFTA superhighway. He was famously one of six Republicans to vote against the illegal neocon war in Iraq, and was one of three Representatives to vote against the socialist No Child Left Behind. He also has one of the largest grass-roots support networks of any member of Congress.

We finally have some real candidates, and it is about time. Our country is being invaded on a daily basis, and we need a strong arm at the helm.

John McCain, Rudolph Giuliani, Condoleezza Rice, Sam Brownback, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney are all unacceptable as candidates. McCain, Giuliani, and Rice are all liberals. Romney is a liberal in disguise. And Huckabee and Brownback are so pro-illegal alien that they should move to Mexico.

Regarding immigration, McCain, Giuliani, Rice, Brownback, Huckabee, Gingrich and Romney all support the third-world invasion of the United States. Although Gingrich and Romney say they are against amnesty, they both supported it only two years ago, and Gingrich was given a grade of D by ABI for his time in Congress. Furthermore, although Romney and Gingrich may combat illegal immigration on some levels, both support massive increases in legal immigration, which is no solution at all. Legal immigration is as much of a problem as illegal immigration.

If McCain, Giuliani, Rice, Brownback, Huckabee, Gingrich or Romney receives the GOP nomination, then real conservatives will have no choice but to vote third party.

Let’s hope, though, that a real conservative does get the nomination. Let’s throw our support behind Paul, Tancredo or Hunter.

However, if Paul, Tancredo and Hunter go into the primaries together, they could divide the right-wing vote. Two will have to drop out before the primaries and throw their support behind the one remaining, so the right-wing vote will not be divided. According to some rumors, we could see some interesting combinations, such as a Paul / Tancredo ticket or a Hunter / Tancredo ticket. And there is also the possibility that Reps. Virgil Goode, Walter Jones and John Duncan could be considered as running mates.

Spread the word and celebrate; the GOP finally has a few real candidates.

Stop the third-world invasion!

Construction on the NAFTA Superhighway, encompassing I-69 and directed by NASCO, has already begun in two states. It will run from central Mexico, through the middle of the United States, through Kansas City, and up into Canada. It will be four football fields wide, off limits to most Americans, and run by foreign companies.

The mechanism to implement the NAU is the SPP (Strategic and Prosperity Partnership of North America), which was settled between President Bush, President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin during their March 2005 summit meeting in Waco, Texas. Sec. of State Condoleezza Rice has been instrumental in setting the SPP plans in motion. The North American Union will modeled after ultra-liberal European Union, and put in place by administrative regulations under the SPP umbrella.

Outraged by this plan, four patriotic Congressmen (Reps. Virgil H. Good, Walter B. Jones, Ron Paul, and Tom Tancredo) have introduced H. Con. Res. 487, which states that “the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.” In the last few weeks, patriot Americans from all over the United States have been telephoning their Congressmen demanding that H. Con. Res. 487 be put to a vote and passed in 2007.

Nevertheless, cheerleaders for the Bush Administration deny that any plans for a North American Union exist. Neocon Michael Medved says that “there’s no reason at all to believe in the ludicrous, childish, ill-informed, manipulative, brain dead fantasies about a North American Union. The entire chimera has been conjured up to scare people over nothing….”

If there are no plans for a North American Union, then why did four of the most patriotic Congressmen see it necessary to introduce H. Con. Res. 487? And if it is not real, then what would H. Con. Res. 487 harm? Legislation preventing a “chimera” certainly cannot present any danger. Why are neocon Trotskyites like Medved becoming so emotionally unstable over a bill to prevent a “chimera”?

To any discerning mind, plans for a North American Union do exist. One only need to look at the wording of SPP documents, or look at the NASCO website. It has been set in motion. As Cicero famously said, “patere tua consilia non sentis, constrictam iam horum omnium scientia teneri coniurationem tuam non vides?”

How have we come to this place? The NAFTA agreement can be seen as the beginning, which the wisest recognized as a disaster from day one. Historically, conservatives have opposed free trade, and they should. It is destroying our economy, it is undermining our sovereignty, and it is national suicide. Many in the GOP, however, have been “neoconned” on this issue.

To see the connection between free trade the dissolution of the USA under the North American Union, only need to read Karl Marx. On Jan. 9, 1848, in “On the Question of Free Trade,” Marx said, “…in general, the protective system of our day is conservative, while the free trade system is destructive. It breaks up old nationalities and pushes the antagonism of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie to the extreme point. In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade.”

Notice, Marx’s celebration of the breaking up of “old nationalities.” Such a statement is similar to GW Bush’s claim that the USA is not an “actual place,” but an “idea.” Neocons celebrate this Marxist notion of a “propositional nation,” because it removes the historic prerequisites of nationhood: borders; a common language, history and genealogy; blood and soil; kith and kin; and genophilia (instinctive attachment to family and tribe).

It is thus that GW Bush and others have so adamantly supported the third-world invasion of American, and why many predict that the 700-mile fence will not be built. The U.S.-Mexico border must be abolished for the implementation of the North American Union.

It is all about profit and cheap labor, and big business adamantly supports the prerequisite of the North American Union: the third-world invasion of America. During the Cold War, big business sided with many conservatives to oppose Marxism. Now, however, most large corporations side with the internationalist Left.

Only look at Wal-Mart. Recently Wal-Mart has started giving enormous sums of money to radical pro-homosexual groups, and last year Wal-Mart gave more money to La Raza than to any other organization. What is La Raza? It is the mestizo pro-immigration group that has called for the complete elimination of the white race.

Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, founder of La Raza, has proudly said: “We have an aging white America…. They are dying…. They are ******** in their pants with fear! I love it!” He then demands: “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”

In the 1950s, when our country was invaded, President Eisenhower responded with “Operation Wetback” and deported around a million invaders in a single year. Today, however, politicians say they are unable. Rather, they are unwilling.

Some of the greatest traitors in American history are right before our eyes: GW Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, John McCain, Arlen Specter, Lindsey Graham, Mike Huckabee, Sam Brownback, “Aztlan” Linda Chavez, Alberto Gonzales, Carlos Gutierrez, Ted Kennedy, “Crackhead” Barack Obama, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, John Edwards, Harry Reid, Linda Sanchez, Robert Menendez, Luis Gutierrez, Solomon Ortiz, and the list goes on and on. These miscreants have chosen Mexico, multicultural political correctness, and big business over hard-working Americans. They have betrayed Middle America.

And what can be done to stop this North American Union (aka, treason)?

Call and write your Congressmen, and demand a real patriotic President in 2008, like Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo.

We are under attack – both from within and without. Prepare for the oncoming madness! Stop the North American Union! Stop the third-world invasion!

And so it is….

John McCain, Rudolph Giuliani and Condoleezza Rice are all liberals. Mitt Romney is a liberal in disguise. New Gingrich is a neocon. And Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee are both liberal globalists who support the third-world invasion of America.

In fact, all the above candidates (except possibly Romney, and that’s uncertain) support the third-world invasion of America. McCain, Giuliani, and Rice all openly embrace the third-world invasion. Newt Gingrich used to be one of the biggest citizenship auctioneers in the country; Americans for Better Immigration gave him a grade of ‘D’ on his immigration report card. And Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee are pro-immigration radicals, who are to the Left of most Democrats on the issue, and openly advance the third-world invasion of America.

Regarding the catering to illegals, McCain, Giuliani, Rice, Gingrich, Brownback and Huckabee would have been tried for treason 50 years ago. But now they want to run for president? O tempora! O mores!

So, what picks are left?

Here are our current picks:

GOP: Tom Tancredo or Duncan Hunter
Constitution Party: Jerome Corsi, Michael Peroutka, Chuck Baldwin
Reform Party: Lou Dobbs

Tom Tancredo has not yet declared, but people are hoping he does. Many too are rooting for Ron Paul, but he has made no announcement. Pat Buchanan would be an excellent candidate to run for the GOP ticket, but he says he has no intention of doing so.

Why should the GOP run liberal when a conservative can win? Recent internal polls at the Democratic Party show that Hillary “left-wing radical” Clinton and Barack “Crackhead” Obama, although they may win the Democratic ticket, have no chance at winning the presidency. This means that someone like Tom Tancredo or Duncan Hunter actually could win. We need a real conservative candidate.

There too still remains Lou Dobbs, whom conservative bloggers are trying to draft for the Reform Party ticket. He has a very large popular following, and could steal votes from both parties.

The two main issues to watch this election are immigration and free trade.

Immigration is the most important issue facing America (and most other first-world countries). If the third-world invasion of America is not halted, America soon will just be another third-world sewer. We need a strong hand at the helm to defeat this deadly invasion. We need deportations, more fences, penalties for employers, and drastic reductions in legal and illegal immigration.

Free trade is the second most important issue. Historically, conservatives have opposed free trade, and they should. It not only is destroying our economy, but it also is eroding our national sovereignty. Unfortunately, many on the GOP have been “neoconned” into supporting this national suicide.

We have a dangerous marriage today that needs to be eradicated: multiculturalism and big business.

During the Cold War, big business would often side with conservatives, as it was prudent to oppose communists. Today, however, big business most often sides with the far Left.

Only look at Wal-Mart.† Recently Wal-Mart has started giving enormous sums of money to radical pro-homosexual groups, and last year Wal-Mart gave more money to La Raza than to any other organization.† What is La Raza?† It is the mestizo pro-immigration group that has called for the complete elimination of the white race.

Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, founder of La Raza, has proudly said: “We have an aging white America…. They are dying…. They are ******** in their pants with fear! I love it!” He then demands: “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”

And radicals like this have been supported by the likes of McCain, Rice, Giuliani, Gingrich, Brownback and Huckabee. We don’t need these backsliders in the White House.

We need a real patriotic American who will put America first, and do what is best for America. In short, we need someone to end this madness. Stop the third-world invasion!

As Senator Sam Brownback (“Amnesty Sam,” as National Review has called him) considers a run for the 2008 GOP presidential nomination, conservatives should think real hard about his record. Is this really the kind of man we want in office?

Sen. Brownback has a horrendous record on immigration. He is about two miles to the Left of most Democrats on this issue. Americans for Better Immigration gives him a overall grade of D. On reducing chain migration, he receives an F-; on reducing visa lotteries, F-; on reducing unnecessary visas, F-; and on reducing amnesties, F.

Sam Brownback is no friend to hard-working Americans. He has tossed aside law and order and, like Ted Kennedy, has sold out the American middle class in the hope of pandering to 20 million illegals. Brownback has not only refused to stop the third-world invasion of America, he has done much to encourage it.

Brownback allegedly has ties with Opus Dei, which has been called “conservative,” but really is not. It is comprised of third-world radicals intent on invading the first world, and Brownback has apparently been swayed by their rhetoric. These globalists and their anti-Kirkian ideology resemble Marxists more than traditional conservatives. Unlike traditional secret societies in Europe that emphasize Blood and Soil, European Kith and Kin, Opus Dei is a rag-tag band of third-world parasites intent on taking over America.

But Brownback is up to his ears in liberal internationalism. Unlike traditional conservatives who recognize that different forms of government are more appropriate for different cultures, Sam Brownback supports the Jacobin transformation of the world to liberal democracy. He, furthermore, in the name of “human rights” (a liberal creation), wants the US to become even more interventionist and go into Darfur. (I suppose while our boys are dying in Darfur it will be even easier for Brownback’s hordes to invade America.)

Amnesty Sam also supports free trade, despite the fact that we now have the largest free-trade deficit in the world. Historically, conservatives have opposed free trade, and they should. It is destroying our economy and undermining our sovereignty. Many in the GOP, however, like Brownback, have been “neoconned” on this issue.

Given the recent GOP defeat, the Republicans should choose a strong anti-immigration presidential candidate, like Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo. Despite the neocon propaganda, more pro-amnesty Republicans lost in the recent election than did anti-immigration Republicans. Only 6.7% of Republicans losing were members of Tancredo’s caucus, whereas 40.9% of the seats lost were those of pro-amnesty Republicans (whom Americans for Better Immigration gives a grade of ‘C’ or lower on their Immigration Report Cards). Furthermore, polls still show that an overwhelming majority of Americans want to see massive reductions in legal and illegal immigration. Average working Americans, unlike Brownback, do not support the third-world invasion of America.

In short, Sam Brownback is no friend to conservatives. He has sided with the treasonous pro-amnesty lobby, and he actively has supported the third-world invasion of America. Fifty years ago this would be called “treason,” but today Brownback says it is “conservatism.” Don’t be fooled by Amnesty Sam’s rhetoric. He is a liberal globalist and should be avoided like the plague.

As recently reported, an acquaintance of mine has recently experienced this madness. Her once predominantly white neighborhood is now 85% Hispanic. Crime has increased 800%, HIV 700%, rape and gang shootings are rife, and an all-Hispanic school board has removed all white authors from the district reading list.

She, like many other parents, had no choice but to home-school her children. She participates in a white great-books home-schooling network, which is quite popular in her area. In such programs, students read primary texts, starting with the Greeks and Romans, and work their way through the Western Canon.† They study Latin, history (European and British), literature, Christianity, science, and mathematics.† I was told, “Without such a program, white children would learn nothing of their European heritage.”†

Should this be a surprise? Why do Hispanics so hate Western Civilization? Just look at Mexico. With the exception of a very small upper class of European descent, most Mexicans are either Amerindian or Mestizo (mostly Amerindian with a few drops of Spaniard or African blood). In short, most Hispanics are genealogically Asian, they are not Western, and they despise the West.

It is now commonplace for Hispanics to ask for the removal of all “European elements” from their liturgy, and they now have actively been removing white authors from reading lists.

Many Hispanics identify with terrorists. We know for certain that Hispanics are helping terrorists sneak across the Rio Grande. They have made alliances with terrorist cells in India and Bangladesh. At a soccer game in Mexico recently, the crowd erupted in applause when a picture of Bin Laden was shown on the screen. Furthermore, as recently reported by the Christian Science Monitor, at least 200,000 Hispanics in the United States have recently converted to Islam, and this number is expected to increase exponentially.

Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, founder of La Raza, has proudly said: “We have an aging white America…. They are dying…. They are ******** in their pants with fear! I love it!” He then demands: “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”

We are under invasion and there is no other way to put it. These invaders are children of Aztlan, and they plan to reclaim the Southwest United States.

Although most Americans want a drastic reduction in legal and illegal immigration (i.e. they want this third-world invasion to end), most of our elected “leaders” are ignoring this situation. They have sided with the invaders against their own constituents, and the mainstream media refuses to run stories on it. They furthermore want to accelerate the invasion by promoting the treasonous NAFTA Superhighway and the North American Union.

In the 1950s when our country was invaded, President Eisenhower responded with “Operation Wetback” and deported over one million illegals in a year. Today, however, many of our “leaders” either sit idle as our once-great country is raped and pillaged.

We need a strong arm in the White House (like Tom Tancredo, Duncan Hunter, Jim Gilchrist, Lou Dobbs, or someone of similar values) in 2008, or all will be lost. And we need an active patriot militia movement all across America. People in Southern California have already been run out of their schools, towns, and churches. If we do not make a stand now, this will become the norm all across America. We are under attack! Stop the third-world invasion!

The GOP is in serious trouble. All conservatives I know are furious that the pro-amnesty Mel Martinez will be the new RNC Chair. A GOP county chair recently said to me, “If the GOP continues to move to the Left, conservatives will have no choice but to vote third party in 2008.”

Historically the Republican Party has been a very liberal party, and only recently has it become more conservative. From the 1860s to the 1950s, for example, one could easily find more conservatives in the Democratic Party than in the Republican. Are the left-wingers at the helm (Bush, Rove, McCain, Mike “Amnesty” Pence) steering the GOP back to its liberal roots? It appears so.

One would think that the recent election would have set back the liberals (aka neolibearls, neocons, globalists, et al.) in the GOP. It was a referendum on Iraq, not immigration, and by far more pro-amnesty Republicans lost seats than did anti-amnesty Republicans. This election, in theory, should pave the way for conservatives, but the liberals still control the party.

Many liberal talking heads still represent the GOP in the media (Linda “Aztlan” Chavez, Bill Kristol, Fred Barnes), and they despise real conservatives. And now the appointment of the left-winger Mel Martinez as party chair is a complete slap in the face to patriots who love the United States.

For the past 6 years or more, the neocons have directed much Republican policy, and have transformed the party into one of neoliberal globalism (aka neoconservatism). Now, with liberals like McCain, Giuliani and Romney moving into prominence, this leftward momentum will continue.

The GOP is peddling liberal candidates (John McCain, Rudolph Giuliani, Mitt Romney, and Condoleezza Rice), and trying to silence potential conservatives (like Tancredo).

Despite what they may say to secure the nomination, McCain, Giuliani, and Rice are all pro-affirmative action, pro-choice, pro-homosexual, pro-interventionist foreign policy, pro-NAFTA superhighway, pro-North American Union, and support the third-world invasion of America.

Although Mitt Romney has tried recently to sell himself as a conservative, he has a very long track record of liberal causes. One can almost be certain that he is a liberal in disguise.

Some may say that Newt Gingrich is not a liberal per se, but he (unlike Reagan) certainly backs a neocon interventionist foreign policy, and would probably start another war. And although he recently has criticized the third-world invasion of America, only a few years ago he supported amnesty. Newt Gingrich is more neocon than conservative.

Furthermore, all the above support free trade, which is destroying the American economy. Historically and philosophically, conservatives have opposed free trade, and they should. It is national suicide. But many in the GOP, like those above, have been “neoconned” on this issue.

The only hope for conservatives in the GOP is that Tom Tancredo may run and secure the party nomination. He probably has the largest grassroots support of any candidate, which would put him at an initial advantage. Although liberals in the party like Mehlman and McCain have tried to silence him, Tancredo has grown into a national legend.

Although Tancredo backed Bush’s neocon war in Iraq, it does not appear to be a major issue for him. On everything else, Tancredo is right. He is pro-life, pro-values, pro-small government, opposes the treasonous NAFTA superhighway, opposes the ultra-liberal and unconstitutional North American Union, and vehemently opposes the third-world invasion of America.

If Tancredo does not secure the nomination, and a liberal does (like McCain, Giuliani, Romney, Rice or Gingrich) then conservatives will have no choice but to leave the party. One can expect to see a mass Exodus from the GOP in 2008.

Jim Gilchrist, of the Minutemen, may seek the 2008 nomination for the Constitution Party, and would make a fine president. He also is probably the highest profile candidate the Constitution Party could run. Gilchrist is socially conservative, anti-North American Union, and wants to stop the third-world invasion of America. I know not a single conservative who would vote for a liberal like McCain over a conservative like Gilchrist.

Although only a rumor among bloggers, there is the hope that Lou Dobbs may seek the Reform Party nomination. Dobbs, a great patriot, is a life-long conservative, anti-North American Union, anti-free trade, and opposes the third-world invasion of America. Dobbs also is very popular nationally, potentially could sweep the general election, and would be an outstanding president. If Lou Dobbs runs, you should expect to see many defections not only from the GOP but also from the Democratic Party.

At this point, the only hope for conservatives, and the American middle class, is Tancredo, Gilchrist or Dobbs. Let’s pray that at least one of them – or someone who shares their values – is running for president in 2008.

————-
William H. Calhoun is a conservative, writer, and graduate of the University of Chicago. He can be reached at williamhcalhoun@yahoo.com

Eliminate the whites, eh? This should be no surprise. ‘Raza’ is Spanish for ‘race’, and Hispanics are quite racially conscious. Only take a look at Mexico. With the exception of a very small upper class of European blood, over 90% of Mexicans are either Amerindian or Mestizos (mostly Amerindian with a few drops of Spaniard or African blood).

In short, they are not Western, nor do they identify with the West. They recently have called for the removal of all “European elements” from their liturgy, and they have banned all white authors from some schools in Southern California. Most Mexicans, Asiatic in origin, have a secret resentment and hatred of Western Civilization.

They are the children of Aztlan, and they plan to retake it. As Mexican activist Ricky Sierra has said, “We are recolonizing America and they are afraid of us. They are very afraid. It is time for us to take back what is ours.” They believe the Southwest is rightfully theirs, and they will do whatever it takes to reclaim it.

As a result, Hispanics have made temporary alliances. Many in the Mexican military and gangs have helped Arabic terrorists sneak into the United States. More recently, at a soccer game in Mexico, the fans apishly applauded a picture of Osama Bin Laden shown on a screen. Arabic terrorists, Mexican government, Mexican military, Mexican gangs, and certain US government entities have all been privy to this invasion.

This is an invasion of America, and there is no other way to see it. Mexico, like most other third-world nations, despises the West. But they know they cannot defeat it in conventional battle, but only invade under the auspices of “reverse colonialism.” The West contains most of the world’s resources, and the third-world hordes regularly invade the West to rape and ravish it of its riches. And it is not just Mexico that invades, but all of South America, Africa, Asia, China and India are coming too.

It is only with more earnest measures that we can stop this illegal invasion. For starters, we must demand serious border security. We need fencing along the entire US-Mexico border, with razor-wire reinforcements. We need land mines placed all along the US-Mexico border. We need agents to open fire at anyone approaching the US border. And we need more auxiliary units of volunteer militias to guard the border, and then to help round up and deport all the illegals currently in the US.

It will be harsh, but necessary. Many Mexicans in the US military will probably side with Mexico, and there will be a civil war of sorts in the armed services. This strife will expand among the civilian population. Legals will fight illegals on the streets. Rockets and bullets will light the sky, but in the end, I know, I hope, the patriots will be victorious, and they will drive the alien invaders into the sea.

In the 1950s when our country was invaded, President Eisenhower responded with “Operation Wetback” and deported over one million illegals in a little over a year. Today, Bush says he is unable. Rather, he is unwilling. By 1950s standards, he should be impeached and tried for treason.

The Treason Lobby has infiltrated both the Democrat and Republican parties. The Democrats side with the invaders for cheap votes, and the Republicans for cheap labor. But whatever the motivation, it is treason nonetheless, and it should not be tolerated.

We are losing our country. Within a generation, it could be gone. Our once great and noble land will be just another third-world wasteland, not unlike Mexico City or New Delhi. The beautiful countryside will be devastated, the cities polluted, and untold diseases will infect our population. We will cease to be a “Western nation,” and become an unrecognizable amalgamation of third-world crime, disease, corruption, and human filth: a 21st-century cesspool.

Let’s end this invasion, before it is too late.

Mr. Massey argues that the flow of goods brought about by NAFTA has caused more illegal Mexicans to come to America, and that protecting the borders is inconsistent with free trade. Mr. Massey then goes on treasonously to assert, “The time is thus ripe for the United States to abandon its illusions and to accept the reality, indeed the necessity, of North American integration.”

It seems that every member of the Treason Lobby always spouts the same clichÈ: “Oh, enforcement is impossible.” This is not only a lie (and they know it), but it is an unpatriotic treasonous lie. Stopping the third-world invasion of America is not only possible, it is necessary – if we are to survive. We are under invasion, and more earnest efforts need to be taken.

If free trade is the cause of more illegal invasions, then let’s end free trade. The United States now has the largest free-deficit of any country in the history of the world, and we are probably approaching a catastrophic economic collapse. Free trade itself has not benefited 99% of Americans, nor do its alleged side effects.

But free trade alone is not the primary cause of the invasion. Western countries still have massive invasions from countries with which they have no free-trade agreements.

The primary cause of the third-world invasion is “reverse colonialism.” Western countries still possess most of the world’s wealth, so the hordes from the third-world come here to ravish it. As the West visited third-world countries in the 19th Century to acquire goods and materials, now the third-world natives invade the West to sack it of its riches. Sounds like the fall of Rome, doesn’t it? We are under attack.

The reason why current border enforcement does not work is because the enforcement is too weak. It is time to get tough on immigration. Here is a more feasible plan:

(1) Place fencing along the entire US-Mexico Border

(2) Buttress this fencing with more razor-wire fencing. Have the razor-wire fencing right along the Mexico border. Place the double-wire inland about 30 feet.

(3) In between the razor-wire and double-wire fencing, place random land mines about every 30 feet.

(5) Have armed guards, patrols, militias and citizens vigilantly patrol the border. Shoot at anything that approaches the razor-wire boundary. Ask questions later.

This approach may seem harsh, but I assure you that after shots are fired and land mines exploded, word will get out and the invasion will begin to taper off.

Then after the border is under control, raise local militias all over the United States, perhaps under the direction of the state national guards, round up every last illegal one can find, and send them packing.

Some fighting would certainly occur. Hispanic gangs and terrorist groups are currently arming much of the Hispanic population, especially in Southern California. We also know that many Hispanics are currently aiding terrorists to sneak into the United States. Recently, at a soccer game in Mexico, when a picture of Bin Laden was shown on the screen, fans begin to applaud and cheer endlessly.

With the exception of a very small upper class of European blood, most Mexicans are either Amerindian or Mestizos (mostly Amerindian with a few drops of Spaniard or African blood). These people are not Western. They detest the West. Hispanics in Mexico are currently demanding that all “European elements” be removed from their liturgy, and they recently banned all white authors at some schools in Southern California.

Hispanics have a strong identity, and they are prepared to fight for Aztlan. As Mexican activist Ricky Sierra said, “We are recolonizing America and they are afraid of us. They are very afraid. It is time for us to take back what is ours.”

But in the end, I am confident, the patriots would be victorious, and the illegals would be chased across the borders and driven into the seas.

Stern measures need to be taken. Our country is currently under invasion, and the traitors in Washington do not seem to care, so long as they can make a fast buck.

In the 1950s when our country was under invasion, President Eisenhower responded with “Operation Wetback” and deported over a million illegals in a little over a year. Today, however, Bush says that he is unable. Rather, he is unwilling. By 1950s standards, Bush should be impeached and tried for treason.

We are under invasion. This is a war. Hispanics, via reconquista, plan to retake “Aztlan.” They invade us daily. 20 million of the enemy are among us, waiting to strike.

Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, founder of La Raza, says: “We have an aging white America…. They are dying…. They are ******** in their pants with fear! I love it!” He goes on, “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”

Clearly this is an act of war. Clearly any sane mind can see we are under attack. It is time to defend our land, kin and kith. Enforcement is vital and necessary, and it is time to take off the gloves and put on the brass knuckles. It is time to get tough on the illegal invasion. Our posterity depends on it. Our very survival hangs in the balance!