When Specter starts holding up nominations again don't say I didn't "tell you so". Most of the Republicans at the local Bush/Cheney victory centers kept saying "Don't worry, Specter made a 'deal'." Yeah, and Specter's word is worth OH so much. The guy is a conservative 5 months out of every 6 years to gain reelection. The rest of the time he is moderate at best.

Conservatives who voted for Specter over Clymer because he had an "R" next to his name will reap what they sowed unless Republicans in the Senate beat on Specter to get his job done. I mean REALLY beat on him. Bush is similarly at fault and to blame for Specter being elected. In the primary Specter and Toomey were neck and neck with Toomey gaining every day. There was no scandal; no anything that would have changed that. Except for Bush showing up in the final week to campaign with Snarlin' "Magic Bullet" Specter. That was all that was needed.

President Bush should have stepped back and simply said that he could work with either man and stayed out. Don't you just love politics though?

source

"When you talk about judges who would change the right of a woman to choose, overturn Roe v. Wade, I think that is unlikely," Specter said, referring to the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion.

and in response to "Giants" of the Supreme Court

"With all due respect to the (current) U.S. Supreme Court, we don't have one," he said.

And with Specter re-elected, you won't have one for another 6 years. Because as long as Specter is there you will not get a nominee through that strictly interprets the Constitution and applies the UNALIENABLE rights of all granted in the DOI to everyone...including unborn children.

Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!