Is it over?

Thursday, July 29, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 10:56 PM


Nope...not yet...Kerry has been up on stage for over 40 minutes and I still don't know what he has to say...wait! What's that? OMG HE'S FINISHED! Thank you GOD!...I'll have more on his ramblings later...


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

Michael Moore continues to spin...

Wednesday, July 28, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 7:44 PM


Last night on O'Reilly, Moore made an appearance. He talked about how we were wrong to be in Iraq because the Iraqis should have rebelled just like we did against the British.

Michael Moore however fails to recognize a couple important facts about the situation in Iraq. First of all Mr. Moore, the Iraqis DID rebel and they were crushed by superior firepower. So that is quite a bit of a different spin to what you are saying. Also please remember that we had help from the French in our "revolution" before they became too wrapped up in themselves to care about the rest of the world.

To hear my entire point on this topic tune to ConservaCast a brand new FREE service of Conservababes.com. Scroll down and select the file 07_28_04_michaelmoore_by_FluffyDoomBunny (that's my callsign - "FluffyDoomBunny" in case you were wondering). Also listen to yesterday's discussion of Bill Clinton and what he had to say by clicking on 07_27_04_Clinton_Convention.

And before you leave don't forget to listen to ProudMemberVRWC's commentary from yesterday 07_27_04_Mendacity.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

Clinton at the Convention

Tuesday, July 27, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 9:49 AM


I watched it. Yep. Sure did. So what did Bill Clinton say?

Well, it took Old Billy all of 2 minutes to say that they would make sure all the votes would be counted in 2004 and dredge up the 2000 Florida fiasco...HEY BILLY HOW MANY RECOUNTS DID AL GORE WIN THAT DID NOT REWRITE THE RULES FOR COUNTING?!?!?!?!?!

Answer = 0

Then he shifted gears and went on about how the "Republicans" want to concentrate power in the hands of the few...and that "Democrats" don't...

Boy that is some GOOD stuff that Billy is smoking.

I can't believe that he said that with a straight face and then contradicted himself in the next breath saying that "Republicans" don't want have government providing for the people such things as Social Security and Socialized Medicine.

Which one is it BILLY? Do "Republicans" want to concentrate power or do they want to get government out of people's lives?

Only a room full of "Democrats" would applaud this kind on contradictory double speak.

Then he played the "guilty rich guy" routine where he is pretending to be outraged about getting a tax cut while saying that everyone else was paying for it.

But I notice that he stopped short of saying that he donated the money that he got back to the government...hmmmm...Bill pass the joint...maybe then we'll agree with you.

And just for good measure Slick Willy dropped a BOMBSHELL....

JOHN KERRY WAS IN VIETNAM!

OMG did you know that Kerry was in Vietnam? I can't believe that we haven't heard of this before now!

So what did Bill Clinton really say. He said the same old same old. That Democrats want to make you a subject of the state when you are poor and when you are old and have other people pay for it. He accused the Republicans of doing exactly what Democrats want to do and he expects you and I to swallow it hook line and sinker.

And just to put the icing on the cake, to a person on the floor of the convention they praised the speech as being pretty much "centrist" and "non-partisan". You could see the heads nodding in agreement as he spoke and you could feel the wheels of the modern communist movement churning forward.

In truth, nothing Clinton said was "centrist". He talked about balancing the budget which would require raising taxes or cutting social spending and he already said the Democrats wanted to keep the social spending so that means raising taxes. He said that the Democrats NOW want a strong military after years of Clinton cuts. And he boasted that when he left office people were better and the economy was better off than when he went in. Gee Clinton...forget about the recession that started in the last quarter of your Presidency much?

I suppose to socialists and communists the speech may have indeed sounded "centrist" because it didn't call for the outright nationalization of industry in America. But as I always say, a "centrist" is just someone that believes a little bit of socialism, limited freedom, and big government is ok...Socialist-lites.

So keep watching. This is going to be another defining moment for the left wing in this country.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

It runs in the family...

Monday, July 26, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 7:26 PM


A few months back, John Kerry was caught on tape (lowering his voice as he spoke hoping that no one would hear) calling conservatives and Republicans liars, crooks and anything else he thought he could get away with. Now, we see that his wife has a similar propensity for being "caught on tape".

Sunday night she was stumping for her husband and said on tape "We need to turn back some of the creeping, un-Pennsylvanian and sometimes un-American traits that are coming into some of our politics" Later on, Colin McNickle of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review asked what the would be first lady meant when she said "un-American".

Her response rather than answer the question was to say "I didn't say that" several times and to finally end the conversation with "You said something I didn't say. Now shove it."

Why not just answer the question? Why not indeed? Talk about "un-American" traits! Nothing could be much more "un-American" than telling a reporter a bold faced lie after being caught on tape. What about "freedom of the press"?

No, Theresa is just another fringe lefty that realized all too late that what she said will now come back to bite her in the rear. They have spent so much of their time twisting and spinning that they don't even know how to answer a straight question anymore.

Instead they accuse anyone of asking a question they don't like as hatemongers and tell them to "Shove it."

Theresa had better watch what she calls "un-American". Because her husband returning from Vietnam to perjure himself about "war crimes" committed in Vietnam would certain rank right up there in THAT category.






Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

And now for something completely different...

Sunday, July 25, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 3:39 PM


Sports...baseball

The Pittsburgh Pirates are quite possibly one of the hottest teams in the NL Since a HORRENDOUS first 25 days of June where they managed a paltry 4 wins against 19 losses in that stretch, they have been on a mission. Over the 16 games before the All Star Break they ripped out 12-4 mark and as of July 24th were 7-2 since the break. All in all that is a 19-6 streak that doesn't show much signs of ending because of timely hitting and good pitching (something the Pirates have never been able to have both of at the same time over the last decade).

Now however it appears as though they are going to trade Kris Benson in order to dump salary. He is in the final year of his contract and has come on strong over his last 8 or so starts. Problem is he has also been an anchor for a pitching staff that is eating up opposing hitting.

Get rid of Benson and then what? Vogelsong and his 6.69 ERA into the staring lineup?

While the Pirates may feel the need to dump salary in order to make budget this year does it serve not in their best interest to not try and hold on to him? If he is not traded before the deadline and he walks at the end of the year you get nothing. But if you sign him now you keep this team going strong for the rest of the year and see if they can keep it up in 2005. If only Kendall didn't have that huge salary weighing the team town...

...now back to your regularly scheduled dose of politics


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

When will the lies end?

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 12:27 PM


Source: WorldNet Daily

The left keeps digging a deeper and deeper hole for its own grave. According to the 9-11 report Dick Clarke (poster child for the hate America population) wrote in 1999 of bin Laden "one reliable source reported [bin Laden's] having met with Iraqi officials, who 'may have offered him asylum.'"

Clarke went on to state that with Pakistani intelligence being in cahoots with bin Laden if any attack were undertaken "Armed with that knowledge, old wily Usama will likely boogie to Baghdad,"

WOW!

So where does this leave us. It leaves us once again realizing just how far the left wing will go in America to regain their power. Clarke was trumpeted as the man who could bring down all of the Bush Administrations "lies". But we keep finding out that it was the bureaucratic nitwittery of the Clinton Administration that failed America time and again when they failed to act against terror. We keep finding that it is the left wing and their pundits that themselves know the truth, but are unwilling to face it beause it means supporting President Bush.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

Democrats and their continue disregard for the Constitution

Saturday, July 24, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 11:58 AM


WorldNet Daily is reporting that "The local Democratic Party" is supporting the use of the IRS (an agency of government) to interfere with religious freedom by investigating a pastor who gave a "pro-Bush sermon".

The statement, according the WND said the party "looks forward to the day when all citizens may vote their conscience without their political beliefs being dictated to them by politically involved religious leaders, regardless of denomination." and "American democracy is rooted in the principle of the separation of church and state,"

Once again, tell the lie long and loud enough and people will believe it seems to be the Democratic Party's main objective. Let's review the relevant passage of the Constitution shall we and try to inform these "Democrats" what it really says.

"USC Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"


NOTE, the Constitution says that congress (aka the GOVERNMENT) is prohibited from establishing a religion or prohibiting the free exercise there of. It DOES NOT say that religion is prevented from interfering with government.

The "separation of church and state" argument is not a two way battle. It is a one way battle. It is a battle to keep government out of the church. That is it. It is not a battle to keep the church from speaking against the government.

But for Democrats and many liberals, the thought of the church teaching that there is a higher power than the government to whom you will answer is not good. It is not good at all. Because when that happens, they lose power.

So to these "Democrats" (socialists/marxists/communists who hijacked the Democratic Party) you may actually want to READ the Constitution and UNDERSTAND what it says before you make utter fools of yourselves and draw the wrath of religious people upon you. For you will do that if you continue to try and inhibit the free exercise of religion in this nation "Under God".


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

God is on line one...

Wednesday, July 21, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 3:12 PM


From the New York Times
"Though Delgado is having an off year, he remains one of the most respected players in Major League Baseball. Last March when the United States invaded Iraq, Delgado, in his own quiet way, said that for him, enough was enough. He had stood for "God Bless America" through the 2003 season but vowed not to do so this season."

Hello Carlos? It's God on line one. He would like to speak to you. He says STAND YOUR ASS UP and maybe I'll think abut letting you hit a couple more homers.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

MoveOn.org just can't seem to "Move On"...

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 1:55 PM


Now they are asking the FTC to go after Fox News because it DARES to call itself "fair and balanced". Of course, Moveon.org thinks that is a lie and doesn't actually provide any empirical data, just "feelings" as the left is so found of.

The group's website claims "The FTC's job is to protect consumers from deceptive advertising on the part of big media companies". Kind of like MoveOn.org claiming that they are a "grass-roots" organization even though they are taking millions from George Soros? Yeah, that is real "grass-root".

In fact, just about the only thing that this group of red diaper wieners can do is show a video clip of O'Reily saying "shut up" over an over to try and bolster their uneducated opinion. But then again when does context ever matter to the socialist left? They'll complain that because FOX News has Sean Hannity on that it is "unfair" while never mentioning that left-wing parrot Alan Colmes sits across from him every night.

All that MoveOn.org REALLY wants is to harass people that don't agree with their pathetic view of the world as a great big depressing ball hurtling through space.

So Moveon.org...PLEASE just Move On.




Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

Berger update...

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 11:22 AM


According to NewsMax this is NOT a one time event for Mr. Berger...

The next time Mr. Berger went to the Archives, the documents he was given were all marked - and he apparently pilfered those as well.

Over five visits to the Archives on three separate dates, Berger removed up to six copies of an after-action report on the Millennium bomb plot, which was said to be highly critical of the Clinton administration's counterterrorism failures.


What the heck Mr. Berger? You've been hanging around Slick Willie too much it seems.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

Flipping on Berger

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 9:52 AM


In the past Democrats have touted the "seriousness" of the charge as enough to investigate anything they could dream up concerning a Republican. In the past that is.

Mr. Berger is being investigated for removing classified documents from the National Archives. This is not a new investigation. It has been on going. However in typical Liberal fashion, only once it was brought to light was there any attempt to distance John Kerry from Mr. Berger. Now, Democrats are concerned about the "timing" of the release that there was an investigation into Mr. Berger doing something that he admitted to doing and knew full well he SHOULD NOT have done.

And it is the "timing" that has the Democrats in the uproar. The "seriousness" of the charge and the fact that Mr. Berger admitted to what he did means nothing. It means nothing in a political season where the left is so desperate to get their power back that ANYTHING goes. No matter how disingenuous.

The "timing" is not what is disturbing. What is disturbing is that Mr. Berger did a bad thing that he knew was a bad thing and then "lost" some of the documents in the process. How convenient.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

TIME to get real...

Tuesday, July 20, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 8:41 PM


In TIME's July 19th issue, they addressed the issue of "hair" and it's influence on the Presidency. The controversy brought on by John Kerry who claimed that they have "Better Hair" and then refuted by a poll conducted by Wahl Slipper Corp lead to an interesting (to say the least) chart of the Presidency.

For their summary of the 1980 election TIME said:
"Four years later, Carter's pale strands did him in."

Get real. What did Carter in was the fact that Mr. Peanut was an incompetent (at best) President who to this day still doesn't understand how to deal with evil.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

Ronstadt Booted From Casino After 'Fahrenheit' Uproar

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 6:57 AM


That's right, this raving socialist traitor to the nation was actually stood up to by someone. KCCI reports the "entertainer" was booted from the Aladdin in Las Vegas after commenting that Michael Moore was "great American patriot" and "someone who is spreading the truth".

In an election year preview, her comments "drew loud boos" from the crowd of 4,500. Quite a feat considering how "divided" the nation supposedly is over this election eh?

Next stop for Ronstadt? A speaking part at the Democratic National Convention perhaps?


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

Moore Facts? (Part 3) is up...

Sunday, July 18, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 3:03 PM


And after 20 points on Michael Moore's "fact" sheet he has a batting average of 0.000. Not only is it tedious work to go through this pile of crap he calls "facts", but it is also boring as heck. So to read Moore Facts? (Part 3), visit The Land of the Free.

I will be continuing this series over the coming weeks however it will not be the only thing that I am working on. I can almost feel my intelligence level droping as I read these "facts" so a break is in order...but it will be concluded however for the sake of my own sanity I will be doing other projects in between parts 4, 5, 6 and so on.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

Moore Facts? (Part 2)

Thursday, July 15, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 6:45 PM


Continuing on with our look at the lies of Michael Moore:

Michael Moore’s "FACT" sheet continues:

"In his first eight months in office before September 11, George W. Bush was on vacation, according to the Washington Post, forty-two percent of the time."

Why is it presented: to show that President Bush is a liar, and idiot and an incompetent President
The problem here is that "vacation" implies that someone is away from their work and detached from the duties required by it. Ask the average citizen what "vacation" means and you will get a similar response. Moore’s Washington Post "source" says that these vacations were "weekends at Camp David, layovers at Kennebunkport and assorted to-ing and fro-ing". Are these "vacations"? How does a President go on "vacation"?


Does he perhaps spend time outside of the Oval Office and does this time away constitute "vacation"?
No. Michael Moore and the Washington Post actually provide no evidence that President Bush was on "vacation" in the traditional sense of the word. He did show that yes, President Bush spent a lot of time out side of the Oval Office however.


The USA today on 8/3/2001 even reported "White House officials point out that the president is never off the clock. They refer to the 30 days at his Texas ranch — now it's called the Western White House — as a working vacation. "He'll receive daily national security updates and handle the duties of the Oval Office from his 1,583-acre spread near Crawford."

This statement is presented to give a false impression, hence definition #2 of a lie "to create a false or misleading impression".
 
(Read the rest in Moore Facts? Part 2)


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

Moore Facts?

Wednesday, July 14, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 4:54 PM


Yes, I know that every conservative is exposing the lies of Michael Moore however I had to start doing this to rebut some liberals over at Conservababes so I don't want it to go to waste. Without further delay, Moore Facts? (Part 1)...

Liberals left think that because Michael Moore posts a “fact” sheet on his site that therefore criticism that he is a liar is unfounded, right-wing, hate mongering. So what exactly is a lie? According to Webster’s dictionary, the word is defined as “1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive” or “2 : to create a false or misleading impression”.

Are some of the things that Moore lists on his “fact” sheet true? Yes. Can you lie while telling the truth as well? Yes. Right now, liberals are trying to stop their heads from spinning at that statement. But they do it and know it is true. As liberals parroted the line the Bush said “the threat is imminent” with regards to Iraq, they did exactly what I said above.

Bush did indeed say the words “the threat is imminent” when talking about Iraq. However he did not say that Iraq was an “imminent” threat. His exact quote was "Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?" - President George Bush (January 2003, State of the Union)

Hence, a true statement is turned into a lie. Putting the words “the threat is imminent” into context changes the meaning of the words. Yes, President Bush did say those words, however he did not say that Iraq was an imminent threat. This is definition #2 of a lie, which is “to create a false or misleading impression”.

So let’s begin by putting Michael Moore’s latest “documentary” into perspective. Who is Michael Moore?

(Read the rest at The Land of the Free - Moore Facts? (Part 1))


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

STILL the UN has not learned...

Tuesday, July 13, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 9:39 PM


"The UN Security Council was mulling a US resolution to impose sanctions on the militias in Sudan's Darfur region, with opposition strong despite the scope of the humanitarian tragedy."

So reports the AP today.

It's Iraq all over for them. They tried to negotiate with evil and got burned with Saddam and now they are trying the same tactic in the Sudan. It doesn't work. But then again, you wouldn't actually expect an organization filled with third world despots and dictators to ever learn how to deal with their own kind now would you?


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

DITKA!

Monday, July 12, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 8:40 PM


From World Net Daily concerning a possible run by Mike Ditka for Senate:

"Ditka says while he lacks political experience, he thinks he'd do a good job as a lawmaker."

What the United States needs is fewer politicians and more "inexperienced" servants considering the state of affairs in Washington these days

Also:

"If you're going to tell me I couldn't be a better senator than Ted Kennedy, D-Mass. – I could be," Ditka said.

That wouldn't be too hard. A ripe tomato would be a better senator than the old bloviator himself.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

More RACISM...

Sunday, July 11, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 9:26 AM


World Net Daily is reporting that "black civil-rights" activists are canceling their protest over a "black" girl who was told her name meant "stupid dirty girl."

Do you know why? Because she isn't black. She is actually white.

Uh oh.

Do you know why these "black civil-rights" activists are canceling? Because they are exactly "black civil-rights" activists and not "civil-rights" activists. In other words, if you are not black we don't give a hoot. Now THAT is racism.

Webster's definition of Racism:
"racial prejudice or discrimination"

To these "black civil-rights" activists the rights of a "black" girl insulted are worth their time. But he rights of a "white" girl are not. Too bad the NAACP doesn't share Rev. King's vision:

"When we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!"

Too bad they only believe in empowering themselves.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

Robert Reich....the Anti-God

Thursday, July 08, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 11:19 AM


(World Net Daily Article to which I refer)

Robert Reich is out there. I mean REALLY out there! Somewhere beyond the rings of Saturn I believe.

"The great conflict of the 21st century will not be between the West and terrorism. Terrorism is a tactic, not a belief. The true battle will be between modern civilization and anti-modernists; between those who believe in the primacy of the individual and those who believe that human beings owe their allegiance and identity to a higher authority; between those who give priority to life in this world and those who believe that human life is mere preparation for an existence beyond life; between those who believe in science, reason, and logic and those who believe that truth is revealed through Scripture and religious dogma. Terrorism will disrupt and destroy lives. But terrorism itself is not the greatest danger we face." He says.

Terrorism is not a belief? Bobby, tell that to the Islamic fundamentalists that vow, in the name of their "god", to kill all the infidels.

You are right however, the true battle to come will be between those that believe in the primacy of the individual (aka what I want is MINE MINE MINE) and those that believe in the allegiance to a higher authority (aka love one another as I have loved you).

Bob's entire premise is that "religion" is incompatible with "modern civilization". In other words, that "God" is obsolete. That's odd. Because last time I looked our entire nation was built upon "God" and a few things that were called "unalienable rights" which stemmed from Him.

Oh, silly me! That's right! In order to destroy America you have to destroy the foundation upon which it was built. In other words you have to make "God" obsolete! Because when God becomes obsolete there is no underpinning to our rights and good little leftists such as Robert Reich can take over and mandate morality and rights from their pulpit without fear of retribution from a higher power they don't believe in anyway.

Once problem there Bobby, it isn't going to work. Want to try? Want to wipe you behind with our founding document, the Declaration of Independence? Go ahead. I would LOVE to see how far you get down the road you wish to travel.

You and Senator Joe Biden can whine like good leftists all you want. But you are eventually going to have to come for those of us that believe in God. And guess what? I hazard to guess that He is on our side.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

What is it with the Democrats?

Wednesday, July 07, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 3:42 PM


We've all been following the story about how SOME liberals want the U.N. (you know, that bastion of Despots and Socialists) to "observe" elections in this country in November. I suppose they fear election fraud that will out do their election fraud.

Well, in a bit of GOOD news and intelligence from the United Nations, Secretary-General Kofi Annan wisely refused the request.

World Net Daily Article

In case you were wondering, the nincompoops that tried this trick were Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Texas, Julia Carson of Indiana; Jerrold Nadler, Edolphus Towns, Joseph Crowley and Carolyn B. Maloney, all of New York; Raul Grijalva of Arizona, Corrine Brown of Florida, Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland, Danny K. Davis of Illinois and Michael M. Honda of California.

So if any of these socialists belong to you, write them a letter and let them know what you REALLY think about them.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

How can this be?

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 3:39 PM


But...but...there aren't any WMDs in Iraq...

WASHINGTON, July 6 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham (news - web sites) announced today that the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Department of Defense (DOD) have completed a joint operation to secure and remove from Iraq (news - web sites) radiological and nuclear materials that could potentially be used in a radiological dispersal device or diverted to support a nuclear weapons program.

Read ALL about it at Yahoo


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

KERRY PICKS EDWARDS!

Tuesday, July 06, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 7:50 PM


Hillary said to be suicidal....

Anyway, in honor of the ticket I figured we need to start coming up with catchy phrases....sooo.....

Kerry Edwards 2004: Because Great Hair makes a GREAT candidate!
Kerry Edwards 2004: Two Johns in Hand is worth a Clinton in the Bush!
Kerry Edwards 2004: When Kerry Slips, Edwards Sues!
Kerry Edwards 2004: Getting ready to sue when FL votes for Bush!
Kerry Edwards 2004: Because you can never have enough SOCIALISM!
Kerry Edwards 2004: Because "51" is "young"!
Kerry Edwards 2004: Because one wealthy elitist snob who wants to take your money and give it to the poor while you can't afford a new car is NOT ENOUGH!


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!
 

4th of July

Sunday, July 04, 2004

Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 11:58 AM


Today's prayer:

Lord, our Father in Heaven, grace us with Your wisdom and Your blessing. In these times of trouble and growing darkness we pray that you shall continue to watch over us and grant us the continued favor of Your Divine Providence which has lead us, as a Nation, since 56 brave men pledged to each other their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor on this day in 1776.

With Your Hand you guided them through the darkness of tyranny and oppression that surrounded them. With Your Hand you guided their offspring as they struggled against darkness in their own time against the Islamic pirates of the Barbary States, against the clouds of a German imperialist State in World War I, against the threat of fascist German and imperialist's Japanese States in World War II, and against the evils of the Soviet State through years of fear of nuclear destruction.

You have not given us clean and swift victory against evil and for that we do indeed thank You. For time and again You have shown us, your children, the horrors of this evil and the results of it when good men do nothing for years. You have shown those that would turn away from Your grace time and again the folly of their actions and the evil within themselves which can only lead to more devastation.

You have shown us the Evil among us and remind us that we as men must be strong and desirous to defeat this Evil. And You have shown us that when we are such, Your sword is swift and powerful and unrelenting against that evil.

And we thank You, on this 4th of July, for the wisdom you endowed to 56 men who did indeed, for the most part, lose their lives and their fortunes in the coming years against Evil. But never once did you take from them their sacred honor. Never once did you take from them anything but that which they freely pledged to lose in you name.

And today we ask that You, our Father, guide with Divine Providence this nation and her soldiers as they fight the new darkness that has come upon this Earth. We ask that You watch over each and every one of our men and women fighting against those that would destroy the unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

And while we know that many will lose their lives in this struggle, and some may even give up their rights to fortunes to serve this country under Your name, we promise to you, our Lord, this day that we will never doubt or stain their sacred honor before your grace.

Amen.


Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Support the Troops T-shirts & Apparel American Eagle
$1.00 from each purchase is donated to the Unmet Needs Program
archives
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005

Support Our Troops