What? No Feminist Outrage?
Wednesday, March 09, 2005
Posted by J. J. Jackson @ 6:04 PM
It never ceases to amaze me how one’s ideology can be so inconsistent yet so widely accepted by their followers. I suppose that when one is as skilled at talking out both sides of their mouths as most “liberals” are that it shouldn’t surprise me that there is a sizable portion of sheep that will simply look at the sound bites that suit their beliefs and ignore the rest in their quest for power. I suppose that when your “hate” (as Howard Dean put it) for the opposition and everything they stand for it doesn’t take a whole lot beyond that “hate” to get you to vote for or support ideological inconsistency.
I wonder if left wing politicians are required to take a course at Liberal University called “Double Speak 101”?
The reason I ponder these things is because I am waiting for the feminist rage over comments by Sentorette Hillary Clinton who said “the presence of women raises the standards of ethical behavior and lowers corruption” laying the ground work for her future political aspirations. However, by doing this the Senatorette claimed to that a core belief of part of her feminist belief is, in fact wrong. She claimed that men and women are different!
If she didn’t believe that men and women were in fact different there is no way that she could even claim that women are less corruptible.
Yet there is silence from the “feminists”. There is no outrage because the Senatorette is promoting a feminine superiority belief. Screw men and women being equal! Now imagine a man saying “the presence of men raises the standards of ethical behavior and lowers corruption”.
You wouldn’t even be able to get a word in before torches were lit, pitchforks were sharpened and cries for blood went out from the “feminist” camp!
But I suppose these are the kinds of political contradictions that occur when you are more interested in being politically expedient rather than being truthful. Like Senatorette Clinton the feminists are more interested in power than anything else.
Promoting a feminine superiority in certain areas is ok. Supporting a masculine superiority in others is not. Basically what this means is that men and women are equal in all areas EXCEPT when women are superior. Now you understand the “feminist” position on women in society.
If you even whisper that men might be better for some things than women your head would be on a pike out front of NOWs national headquarters as a warning to all other intelligent people that using intelligence and common sense will NOT be tolerated. “SIEG HEIL!”
And this, my friends is the true purpose of the feminist movement. It is not, as we are told, to promote the “equality” of men and women but rather the “superiority” of women over men. Watch what they say and do. But equally important you must watch what they do not say and the they do not do. And when you do that you will see that it is the “feminist” movement that is composed of the real sexists and not us in the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
We conservative right wingers know that men and women are different. And we thank God for that! But we also know that being different does not make you less equal before society, the law, and most importantly God.
Now men, grab that liberal feminist next you to breaking down in tears after realizing this and tell her “it’s ok.” Just don’t get your hand closer to her breast than any man would ever want to because you’ll hear her scream “sexual harassment!”
Leave a comment if you like! *Note if you are a left wing, tin hat wearing, pro-Marxist loon that likes to post "anonymously" you will be treated like the kook you are!